YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsBookmaking

Council Wary It May Be Illegal : Bell Casino Requests Adding Asian Game

January 10, 1985|MELINDA BURNS | Times Staff Writer

BELL — The City Council postponed action indefinitely Monday on a request by partners of the California Bell Club for permission to play a new game at the casino that they believe would raise sagging revenues.

The club is losing about $4,000 a day and may close unless a form of the popular Asian game pai gow is allowed, the partners said. They asked for approval of the game with side betting.

Compared to Bookmaking

Council members said, however, they were wary of approving a game that is illegal in some of its many versions and instructed the city attorney to consult the state attorney general's office on the matter. Bell-Cudahy Police Chief Frank Fording spoke against the proposal at the meeting, comparing side betting to bookmaking.

Some council members said they were cautious about granting the owners' request because of recent scandals at the club.

"Confidence in our local city government has been shaken," Councilman Ray Johnson said in an interview. "We want to be like Caesar's wife--above suspicion. We want everything to be absolutely legal and aboveboard."

A yearlong federal investigation resulted in the conviction of two former city officials and several club partners in a racketeering scheme at the club.

"The California Bell Club has been a great thing and a source of misery, too," Councilman George Simmons said at the meeting. "At one time I felt close to it, but no longer . . . . I'm worried sick about this thing (pai gow). I wish it had never come up."

Simmons addressed his next words to a group of club partners and their lawyers seated in the council chambers.

"It's not this council's fault you guys are going down the tubes," he said.

Councilman George Cole also addressed the club partners. "I don't like this situation where we're being told, 'You got to do this, or else,' " he said. "My concerns are maintaining the integrity of the city here."

Cole also described pai gow as a legally "questionable game" and said that the council should not act "in the absence of state guidelines" on the game's many versions.

In traditional pai gow, one player, using tiles like dominoes, bets against seven others. This practice, in which one player bets against more than one other player, is called banking and is illegal under state law.

Side Betting

A popular aspect of the game is side betting, in which additional players stand behind those seated and bet on their game. The legality of side betting is not clear, James Watson, program manager of the state Gaming Commission, said in an interview.

However it is played, Watson said, pai gow "is very difficult to monitor" because any minor variation in the rules changes the game completely. Language presents an added problem for law-enforcement monitors because many players speak Chinese.

Pai gow, which draws a large Asian clientele, was instituted by Gardena and Huntington Park clubs last fall.

Gardena stopped the games entirely in December after the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department advised the city that pai gow was illegal because it was being played in a banking form, City Manager Martin Reagan said.

Huntington Park also stopped the banking version of pai gow in December after the district attorney's office told the city it was illegal, Police Chief Geano Contessotto said.

The Huntington Park Club Corp., which holds the license to operate the Huntington Park Casino, filed suit Dec. 20 against the City of Huntington Park and Los Angeles County, claiming it is legal to play the traditional Asian version of pai gow, Huntington Park City Atty. Elwayne Smith said. A ruling on a preliminary injunction in the case is expected Wednesday in Los Angeles Superior Court, Smith said.

A legal American version of pai gow, in which players may bet only against one other player, is now played at the Huntington Park Casino, Contessotto said. Side betting is also allowed, he said.

Side betting "is kind of a gray area in law," Contessotto said. "There are some differing opinions as to who's right and who's wrong."

Because a side bettor "wins and loses the same as the player, we consider him to be a player," he said.

At Monday's Bell council meeting, Bell-Cudahy Police Chief Fording told the council he believed that side betting is equivalent to bookmaking, in which non-participants place bets on a game of skill, and is therefore prohibited by law. It would be "nearly impossible for the Police Department to monitor" pai gow with side betting, he said.

Fording also told the council he had "serious reservations about (pai gow) in its entirety." Confidential law enforcement sources have indicated that "there is a very real probability of organized crime moving into the game," he said.

Federal Probe

Los Angeles Times Articles