Rule No. 1: Don't sweat the small stuff.
Rule No. 2: Remember, it's all small stuff.
That's Steve Brody's advice for coping with stress, and that's the message he used to deliver on television.
Dressed in workout clothes, Brody delivered a 90-second spot on stress reduction, exercising outdoors while he talked and read the TelePrompTer, before signing off with his rules, a smile and "I'm Dr. Steve Brody."
Brody is a psychologist, and his television spots are an example of the emerging field of media psychology, as are his syndicated, highly anecdotal advice column, The Cambrian Psychologist, and his radio show, which examines topics such as suicide.
The television spots were canceled when a new news director decided to replace him with a cook, Brody told listeners at a workshop during last month's California State Psychological Assn.'s convention in San Francisco.
Brody is president-elect of the association's relatively new Division VI on media psychology. He shared the panel with Diana Hull of Santa Barbara, the incoming president of Division VI, and Jacqueline Bouhoutsos of Los Angeles, founding president of the international Assn. for Media Psychology.
The concerns expressed at the well-attended workshops (there were two), and the information shared, provided ample evidence that media psychology has come a long way toward acceptance within the profession and with the public.
Brody's canceled spots were clearly a temporary setback. Problems with ratings, news directors, agents, publishers and syndication are a far cry from the fairly recent problem of being seen within one's own profession as unethical.
Three years ago, when Bouhoutsos founded the AMP, she said after the workshop, the American Psychological Assn. had only recently changed its guidelines permitting members to give personal advice in all branches of the media. Nevertheless, members and others who did so--such as doctors, nurses and social workers--"were the pariahs," in the eyes of many, Bouhoutsos said. "They were an embarrassment. People were looking at what they did in terms of the long-term, one-to-one, therapist-patient psychotherapeutic model and found what they were doing (was) a mockery of it."
While such negative attitudes can still be found, the field has not stopped developing, defining itself and gaining acceptance. Bouhoutsos said she seldom hears people claim media psychology is harmful anymore, that it exploits the individual for the entertainment of the audience. Nor does she meet resistance within the profession to the notion of dispensing information in plain English rather than academic jargon. And it is no longer being judged on the psychotherapeutic model, she said.
The AMP now has two studies to back up its own observations on the field, Bouhoutsos said. One study, conducted by Bouhoutsos and Patricia Keith-Speigel, former ethics chair of the American Psychological Assn., explored who was listening to the radio call-in shows. Interviewers canvassed two shopping malls--one on the East Coast, one on the West--and found that one out of two persons listened to talk shows. The consensus among listeners was that while they saw the possibility of harm being done, they did not judge that to be the case. The shows were seen as helpful, educational and entertaining--in that order, Bouhoutsos said. Older people often said they listened to gain advice while younger listeners regarded it as educational.
A "serendipitous finding," she said, was that the listeners were relatively psychologically sophisticated. One-third said they had received some form of therapy.
Another study focused on a New York call-in show hosted by Judith Kuriansky, and surveyed callers before they went on the air, after they had talked to Kuriansky and three months later. Again the feedback was positive, except that people expressed frustration at the brevity of their time on the air. More than half had been or were in therapy--a reassuring, if inconclusive, sign to those who feared that call-in shows might become a substitute for necessary psychotherapy.
"It's an emerging field," Bouhoutsos told the workshop. "Media psychology borrows from journalism, communications, the arts, from many creative areas. It's in an amorphous state at present. We're looking for a model. We don't have one yet."
If it's not psychotherapy, what is it? Bouhoutsos tested a few phrases on the group--among them therapeutic education, community psychology, preventive psychology--and said she was most comfortable calling it mental health education.
Her colleague, Diana Hull, speaking with much conviction and enthusiasm for the field, described it this way:
\o7 "This \f7 is the new, the \o7 real \f7 community mental health movement."