Why does Scott Ostler make an argument on behalf of Eric Dickerson and then urge him to report to camp without further negotiations? To me, this is inconsistent.
Taking the $2.2 million due to Dickerson for four years is about one-half of what he should be receiving according to the salaries of other top running backs. Would Scott Ostler like to work for one-half of a reporter's salary?
CHARLIE Z. STEWART
South El Monte