YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Huge Liability Risks Make Policy Renewal Nearly Impossible : Insurance Squeeze Leaving Cities Out in the Cold

November 10, 1985|JAMES RAINEY | Times Staff Writer

Officials in four Westside cities have been searching in vain for insurance protection against large liability lawsuits.

Policies in Beverly Hills and Culver City expired in the last two weeks. Santa Monica's policy runs out at the end of the month and West Hollywood's is scheduled to expire at the end of the year.

Thirty-one cities in the state have not been able to find insurance at any price this year. And that number increases every week as insurers flee the public insurance field, leaving cities to pay liability awards from their own treasuries.

As a result, taxpayers are picking up the tabs for their city's liability insurance, according to Westside municipal officials. Tax money that might otherwise go toward senior citizen housing or new parks might have to be diverted to pay damages to, say, a motorist who crashes after driving over a pothole that the city should have fixed.

The staff in the city of West Hollywood, for example, has recommended that $3.5 million be placed in an insurance reserve because its liability insurance policy, purchased for $89,000, expires on Dec. 29.

'Roll of the Dice'

And in Culver City, City Atty. Bert Glennon Jr. said, "In effect, for the city of Culver City, it has become a roll of the dice as to whether a guy rolls his car over on one side of Venice Boulevard or another. If he rolls on one side, the city of Los Angeles and the taxpayers there could be liable. If he rolls on the other, it could be Culver City's responsibility."

Insurers and city officials blame the situation on the legal doctrine known as joint-and-several liability. Under the doctrine wealthy defendants--particularly cities with "deep pockets"--often must pay damages out of proportion to their degree of fault. For example, a city held 1% responsible for an accident can be ordered to pay 100% of an award if co-defendants in the case cannot afford to pay their share.

According to the League of California Cities, the doctrine led 134 of the state's cities to pay injured people more than $15.5 million in settlements and judgments in the fiscal year that ended June 30. The previous year the amount was $13.2 million, and it was $4.5 million the year before that, according to the league.

Officials in all four Westside cities said they have not had huge claims but worry that one catastrophic accident could seriously dent city treasuries.

Santa Monica purchasing agent Ed Barnes cited a case in Newport Beach last year, in which a young man who became a quadriplegic after hitting his head on the ocean bottom sued the city and won a $6-million judgment.

Insurance company officials say they tried to cover their increased risk with higher premiums, but in the last year most have been unwilling to sell cities liability insurance at any price.

Two Carriers

Only two companies will write liability insurance for California cities, according to D. Michael Enfield, a managing director with Marsh & McClennan Inc., a large insurance brokerage house with headquarters in New York.

Enfield, who specializes in municipal liability insurance and testified on the subject last week before the state Assembly Committee on Finance and Insurance, said the two firms will only renew limited policies for cities they already insure.

A year ago, 25 companies sold such insurance, Enfield said. Now, although police departments, bus lines and other operations can still buy separate policies--although often at higher prices--cities have been left vulnerable principally for traffic accidents and other problems not involving city employees.

The city and county of Los Angeles both use a combination of outside coverage and self-insurance.

The state Legislature is considering a law to limit joint-and-several liability and remove some of the burden from insurers and cities. Meanwhile, cities are on their own.

Although Culver City has insurance for the municipal bus line and some other operations, its general liability coverage expired Nov. 1. The city finds itself in the precarious position of having to pay claims from its treasury.

Culver City had paid $110,000 for the policy, more than three times what it paid in 1984. Under its terms, City Atty. Glennon said, the city was responsible for $300,000 in claims per fiscal year. Anything over that was handled by the insurance company.

"Now that we are self-insured," he said, "the taxpayers will pay the first dollar to the last dollar on any judgments or claims against the city."

Taking a Toll

Glennon said staff members will soon have to consider whether to take money from other programs and put it aside to pay potential claims.

Doing so takes a big toll, according to West Hollywood officials. "It takes a lot of money away from other public services," said city spokeswoman Helen Goss.

Los Angeles Times Articles