Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Homeowners Upset : FAA Clears 767s for Landings at Burbank

April 10, 1986|DOUG SMITH | Times Staff Writer

After reviewing the results of test flights last week, the Federal Aviation Administration on Tuesday approved the use of the wide-body Boeing 767 at Burbank Airport, appearing to clear the way for United Air Lines to begin daily service between Burbank and Chicago.

The Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority still must formally approve the new flights. But the FAA action--deciding the plane could be safely used, with conditions--removed the last major obstacle to the United plan for two daily round-trip flights, beginning May 1.

An airport spokesman said a special meeting of the nine-member authority will be called, perhaps as early as Friday, to take a final vote.

The 767, which is larger than any commercial passenger aircraft now flying into the airport, has already been accepted as meeting the airport's noise regulations. The authority in the past has taken the stand that, under federal court rulings, it cannot bar from the airport airlines that meet noise and safety standards.

The Boeing 767 carries 197 passengers. It has a wingspan of 157 feet, contrasted with the 109-foot wingspan of the largest commercial jetliner now in use at the airport.

Homeowner and anti-noise groups contend that neither new flights nor larger aircraft should be allowed.

"What we've been calling for, for safety and noise reasons, is to reduce flights," said Richard Close, president of the Sherman Oaks Homeowners Assn. "The FAA, which says we have a serious safety problem, says OK to more flights, which makes the problem worse."

The FAA ordered the authority several years ago to relocate the 56-year-old terminal, which is closer to both runways than modern regulations permit. So far, however, the authority has been unable to find an acceptable site.

"We think the FAA is inconsistent and is making a potentially deadly situation worse by more flights, more airlines and bigger planes," Close said.

The airport authority asked the FAA in February for a safety ruling on the 767. The FAA did not answer immediately, but instead required new safety measures at the airport because of the terminal's proximity to the runways. The FAA barred jetliner takeoffs to the east and ordered the airport to submit a short-term plan by April 18 to move the airplane boarding area.

The authority voted Monday to sacrifice about 500 auto parking spaces to create a new boarding area and delivered the plan to the FAA by messenger Tuesday. The same messenger brought back a letter informing Robert W. Garcin, authority president, of the decision to approve the 767, airport spokesman Victor Gill said.

The letter, from Timothy P. Forte, manager of the FAA's Western Region flight standards division, contained several restrictions, Gill said.

The FAA said the 767s cannot land toward the west on the airport's east-west runway, which is 828 feet shorter than the north-south runway. The 767 pilots cannot use visual approaches on southbound landings at night, probably requiring them to make instrument landings toward the east, Gill said. Only the east-west runway is equipped for instrument landings.

A 767 that fails to touch down in the first 2,000 feet of the runway must circle and come in again, he said.

The 767s will be prohibited from parking in front of the terminal, Gill said. This may require the use of a remote boarding location and shuttle buses to carry passengers to and from the terminal, he said. The restrictions were expected and should not interfere with use of the wide-body plane, Gill said.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|