YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

A Scholar's Search for King Arthur : Linguist Separates Historical Fact From Heroic Legends

May 18, 1986|URSULA VILS | Times Staff Writer

At the age of 5, Norma Lorre Goodrich taught herself to read, in her words, by "doping out" "The Idylls of the King."

She is still, albeit on a considerably more sophisticated level, "doping out" the life of King Arthur.

Yes, the life: Whereas many scholars regard Arthur as a legend, Goodrich believes he did indeed live--in the Dark Ages, not the age of chivalry; in a Camelot located in Scotland, not the south of England; as a Christian, not a pagan, and with his queen, Guinevere, whose relationship with Lancelot was not that of lovers but of chieftainess to military vassal.

A 15-Year Effort

To prove her point, Goodrich spent 15 years researching and writing "King Arthur" (Franklin Watts, $21.95), a painstaking, erudite work that she hopes will be used as a textbook.

The work took years of poring over chronicles and legends, medieval poems and studious tomes, of attempting to sort out stories that seem at least partly based on fact from those of 12th-Century-legend authors paid to write popular tales ("the TV writers of their day"). It took years of deciphering geography, of identifying places not only according to still-existing landmarks but of figuring out that a particular location was the same despite its different names in half a dozen ancient languages.

Goodrich and her husband, John Hereford Howard, president of a Monrovia firm of the same name that makes aviation and aerospace fabrics, traveled almost annually to Britain to do firsthand research of the terrain. In her dedication of "King Arthur," Goodrich praises her husband, a highly decorated World War II ace, for knowledge of armies and battles, ships and harbors, that contributed to her research.

But it was Norma Goodrich's background as a linguist and scholar of ancient languages--Old French, Gaelic, Celtic, Manx, Latin--that was the key in unraveling the mystery and mythology of Arthurian literature.

Why so much attention to what many perceive as a charming legend?

"I chose Arthur because I am a medievalist," said Goodrich, sitting in the sunny study of her home in Claremont, where she is professor emeritus of French and comparative literature at Scripps College and the Claremont Graduate School. Outside the garden bursts with blooms, especially a striking array of orchids that she notes are her husband's hobby.

A Lack of Information

"When I came to Claremont about 1970, universities around the country were asking me to give a talk on this and a talk on that. Sometimes I had no choice; they wanted the 12th Century or Marie de France (a medieval writer of Arthurian romances).

"Nobody could say anything (factual) on Lancelot. There was some information on Arthur, but very little. I found a book, 'The Age of Arthur'--but it was not really on Arthur but on the age. I became embarrassed. All the books on Arthur have been on the mythology, the legend."

Why has King Arthur continued to fascinate generations over the years?

"It's the average person, not the scholar, with the fascination," said Goodrich, adding that she omitted a section on the topic from her book because she felt "it was presumptuous" to comment on the public's continuing interest in Arthur.

"In researching the book I'd go to the library and the secretaries would say, 'Don't you prove he wasn't real! I won't read the book.'

"Arthur is an ideal. We live in an age where heroes are debunked so fast--and we don't like it. . . . We live in an age in which countries are ruled by madmen--Hitler. Churchill said, 'If Arthur didn't live, he should have.' We look up to Guinevere, too, because she was heroic.

"(John) Kennedy was a good example, somebody everybody could admire. He was like Lancelot, a person people came to see because they admired him because he felt no fear."

Tracking Lancelot

Deducing Lancelot's name, which varies extensively according to the legend writers and historians, illustrates Goodrich's meticulous detective work. She tells us Lancelot was named Galahad at baptism but Lancelot when crowned a king.

At King Arthur's coronation a King Anguselus of Albania--meaning Albion, at that time a portion of northeastern Scotland--stood equal to Arthur as a great sovereign, Goodrich says in her book. The name Anguselus in Latin becomes Ancelot in the French of the period.

"Nobody could solve it (the mystery) because the name was French and began with 'L,' meaning the ; they should have been looking under 'A' for Ancelot, " she said. ' 'Ancelot into English is Angus. There was a French writer who called him The Angus, " a title that still carries prominence in Scotland, she said.

Despite the multitude of male heroes in Arthurian lore--Arthur himself, Lancelot, Gawain, Perceval, Merlin, a variety of saints and evil kings--Goodrich also focuses on a group of remarkable, strong women, queens and chieftainesses who wielded military power as well as economic clout through inheritance.

Female Heritage

Los Angeles Times Articles