Advertisement

The Campaign for Proposition 51

May 23, 1986

Any newspaper piece about a forthcoming ballot measure seems to be routinely accompanied by a boilerplate paragraph which provides a capsule summary of "who's fer it" and "who's agin it."

Such has certainly been the case with articles about Proposition 51--the only state ballot measure which has attracted substantial media attention.

But something has begun to strike me as a mite strange: Prop. 51 is generally described as being opposed by (not surprisingly) the California Trial Lawyers Association--and by "environmental and consumer groups."

Which "environmental and consumer groups" are on record as opposing this measure never seems to be specified. I guess we're all supposed to take it as a "given" that this measure would not be in the best interests of "environmentalists" or "consumers." (Is that right, all you investigative reporters out there?)

I think of myself as an environmentalist, in my own quiet and personal way. I am, God knows, a consumer--of liability insurance policies, among other commodities.

I would dislike to think that any "consumer" or "environmental" group is presuming to speak for me in opposing Proposition 51. And if anyone can give me a clue as to which of these groups might be channeling my contributions into those nauseatingly sleazy anti-51 television commercials, I would surely appreciate it. My toxic-waste zap-gun is loaded and ready for bull.

Proposition 51 is not a panacea, but it's a step in the right direction. If it fails, perhaps newspapers and even trial lawyers will eventually find themselves out of business.

ANN M. WILLIAMS

Westlake Village

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|