Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Spikes in the Sand : State, Las Tunas Landowners Argue Over Deteriorating Beach Walls

June 22, 1986|JUDY PASTERNAK | Times Staff Writer

Fay Singer learned about the spikes in the sand at Las Tunas Beach nearly nine years ago when contractors broke ground for her two-story house by the sea.

While visiting the construction site, Singer looked down at the excavation and spied a slab of sheet metal, encased in rust and topped by a sharpened point.

"I said, 'That's horrible, that's dangerous. Take it out,' " she recalled last week. "The contractor said, 'Oh no, that goes all the way out into the ocean. That's what keeps the beach here.' "

A line of the metal chunks once had formed the core of a low concrete wall extending into the water from the rocky shore. Engineers call this type of sand trap a groin.

Effective Sand Traps

Thirteen groins, ranging from 80 to 455 feet long, had been placed in 1929 at Las Tunas, a strip of eastern Malibu next to Topanga. The groins did their job. So much sand piled up that the walls were concealed for years.

But over the decades the concrete broke away. Salt water corroded the rows of exposed metal, carving the slabs into jagged teeth--some submerged under the sand and ocean, others barely visible at low tide.

Now the decayed structures are at the center of a bitter dispute, which has blossomed into a lawsuit filed by the state against 110 Las Tunas property owners and Title Insurance & Trust Co., a forerunner of Ticor Title Insurance Co. of California. The company sought the original state permits for the groins, as trustee for the property owners at the time.

Everyone involved agrees the spikes are dangerous; at least two joggers have been injured by them.

Who Should Pay

The quarreling begins when the discussion turns to how to solve the problem and to the most touchy subject of all: Who should pay for the solution.

One option is to cut off the sharp spikes, which has been criticized as a temporary answer, because more jagged edges will form.

Another is repair of the groins, which would expand the beach. A third is removing them altogether. Cost estimates range from tens of thousands of dollars to $1.5 million.

The outcome of the argument will decide more than the fate of the hazardous spikes.

Wide Ramifications

It could affect the future of the private dwellings and a stretch of Pacific Coast Highway, the only direct link between Malibu and the western Los Angeles area. Some experts warn that the houses and the road could be washed away by angry winter waves if the groins are removed and the beach erodes.

The debate's result also will determine whether a state-owned beach will soon be quadrupled in size, providing more shoreline recreation space for the public.

The five western groins front what is now grandly called Las Tunas State Beach, though it is little more than a dirt parking lot, a lifeguard station and a steep drop to the Pacific.

The State Lands Commission wants to remove the five damaged groins, replace them with two extremely long "super groins" at the public beach and import fill to dump there.

Two Birds With One Stone

"One, we take care of the hazard and two, you'd have a nice public beach area," said David M. Hadly, a lands commission attorney. "It would be far enough out that you'd have a beach about four times what you've got now."

Money for the project will be requested in the 1987-88 state budget, said Jim Trout, the commission's assistant executive officer. The amount will depend on "the participation in the project by the homeowners and the title company," Trout said.

To the homeowners, an assorted group of entrepreneurs, artists and scientists, the complexities grow more frustrating every day.

"My husband calls the whole situation 'a kick in the groin,' " said Singer. She laughed. "You can use that," she added.

No Joking Matter

But it's really no joking matter to her. She believes the state has taken the dispute to court now because it hopes that the public portion of the beach can be widened.

"They want this big state beach, but they don't want to pay; they want us to pay," Singer said.

Craig Dummit, an attorney for 43 of the property owners--although not for Singer--agrees. "If that's not the full motivation, it's a major motivation," Dummit said.

If the widening proceeds, the private homes will be sandwiched between two attractive public beaches, Las Tunas State Beach to the west and Topanga State Beach to the east.

Limited Private Rights

The public currently has the right to walk across the private section of the beach near the water. And most of the homeowners' building permits were issued with the requirement that they dedicate their beach, within 5 or 10 feet of their houses, for public use if a government agency ever wants to accept maintenance of the sand there.

Las Tunas Beach homeowners fought a similar beach widening plan in the 1970s, claiming in court that installation of the "super groins" at the public western section would keep sand from accumulating on their private shoreline, where the remaining eight groins have become less effective.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|