Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsAnne Frank

Christian Group's School Text Trial May Set Precedent

July 17, 1986|DAVID TREADWELL | Times Staff Writer

GREENEVILLE, Tenn. — A Hans Christian Andersen fairy tale, the diary of Anne Frank and a story for first-graders in which a girl reads to a boy while he is cooking are among works under attack by a band of Christian fundamentalists in a controversial federal court case here.

Seven sets of parents from the Bible Belt town of Church Hill, in the eastern tip of Tennessee near the Virginia border, charge that the textbooks are "anti-Christian and anti-American" and will corrupt their children's moral values. They contend that the school district should be required to issue alternative texts that conform to their strict religious beliefs.

But county school officials argue that if they do that, the result will be the increasing fragmentation of the classrooms, with students segregated on the basis of religious belief.

See Case as Crucial

The case, seen by both sides as crucial to the fate of public school instruction throughout the nation, opened here this week before a federal district judge in a nonjury trial.

"The schools have no constitutional right to indoctrinate students with ideas that are contrary to their religious beliefs," said Robert B. Mozert Jr., a 39-year-old insurance claims adjuster who is among the families that originally filed the suit against the Hawkins County school district in 1983. "I'm not asking for 'McGuffey Readers' back. All we want are books that don't offend our convictions."

The families contend that the books in question--a series of basic readers for first through eighth graders published by Holt, Rinehart & Winston and widely used in schoolrooms across the country--promote evolution, feminism, supernaturalism, one-world government, rebellion against authority and other concepts they call offensive to fundamentalist Christian believers.

Roles in Story Challenged

Among the examples they cite is a story in the Holt series about Pat, a young girl, who reads to Jim. "Pat has a big book. . . . Pat reads to Jim. Jim cooks," the story begins. However innocuous such a story may appear on the surface, they argue, it nevertheless implants in young minds the idea that "there are no God-given roles for the different sexes."

Other material the families find objectionable includes a Hans Christian Andersen fairy tale in which a child visits a fortuneteller and a passage from "The Diary of Anne Frank" in which the young Jewish girl, hiding from the Nazis in war-torn Amsterdam, writes of trying to convince a friend that he should have some type of religion but "it doesn't matter what."

Hawkins County school officials defend the selection of the Holt texts, which are among those on a state-approved list, and say that providing an alternative curriculum would be difficult and costly.

"We're not trying to teach any particular doctrine," school Supt. Robert Cooper said. "We're trying to teach the students how to read."

Wants More Proof

Ronald Woods, an attorney for the school district, said that the parents must prove that the textbooks go beyond merely exposing their children to different ideas and, in fact, seriously damage their religious beliefs.

"It's difficult to conceive how a school could operate if they open the door for someone to come in and say: 'I don't like this,' " he said. "We see it as a real problem if their relief is granted, particularly in any school district that has limited resources."

People for the American Way, a liberal civil rights lobby co-founded by television producer Norman Lear to counter the religious right, says the lawsuit carries echoes of the 1925 "Monkey Trial" in Dayton, 150 miles from Greeneville, in which John Scopes, a high school biology teacher, was convicted of teaching evolution in violation of Tennessee law.

Cites Risk of Damage

"In 1925, the court focused on a specific question: should evolution be taught in public schools?" the rights organization's officials said in a news release. "Today, the same question is asked in a broader context: is it a violation of First Amendment rights for a public school to expose students to subjects which offend their religious beliefs? If the answer is yes, the damage to public education may be irreparable."

Supporters of the Church Hill families contend that public schools have increasingly usurped the authority of parents and view this case as a way to wrest back control.

"We're losing the rights of parents to determine what children should be taught," said Beverly LaHaye of Arlington, Va., wife of television evangelist Tim LaHaye and founder of the 540,000-member Concerned Women for America, a Washington-based organization that is providing legal and financial assistance for the plaintiffs.

The families' fight began in 1983 after Vicki Frost read through a story called "A Visit to Mars" in one of her daughter's sixth-grade textbooks and was offended by its suggestions of thought transfer or telepathy.

Organized Other Parents

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|