Burbank Airport is the source of 38,000 jobs and $1.3 billion annually in economic benefits, mostly to the San Fernando Valley and adjoining areas, according to a survey made public by the airport.
The study was conducted for the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority..
Airport officials have been fighting a long-running battle with area homeowners, who protest jetliner noise and want to see flights from the airport limited.
"The airport must be recognized for the prosperity it brings," Airport Authority President Robert Garcin said in introducing the report at a meeting last month at the Burbank Airport Hilton. "Thousands of people are counting on it now and into the future."
Direct, Indirect Benefits
The report calculated direct and indirect benefits. Direct benefits include the payroll of airport employees and tenants and money spent by airline passengers in the area.
Indirect benefits include jobs created by the subsequent spending and re-spending of money that was drawn to the region by the airport, including the personal spending of airport employees and money spent by companies that profit from airport business.
The airport and related industries are directly responsible for 13,000 jobs and $813 million annually--$467 million in salaries, $106 million in purchases and $240 million in local spending by air travelers, the survey concluded.
Indirect benefits amount to $519 million and 25,400 jobs, according to the study, done by URS Corp. of Santa Barbara.
Los Angeles County receives 80% of the economic benefits and 92% of the jobs, the survey said.
Almost half the jobs, with earnings of $414.5 million, are held by residents of Burbank or the San Fernando Valley, according to the report. Half of the benefits are distributed in a region made up of Burbank, North Hollywood, Van Nuys, Sherman Oaks and Encino, it said.
A similar study in 1982 credited the airport with generating 22,000 jobs and $550 million in payroll.
Airport spokesmen said the figures had increased because the previous survey did not take into account the spending of travelers. In addition, a more prosperous economy this year has stimulated air travel and more flights by new carriers, they said.
In 1982 the airport handled 28,000 flights, contrasted with an estimated 50,000 in 1986, airport spokesman Victor Gill said.
The report included a survey of passengers at the airport, which found that 44.3% were residents of the San Fernando Valley, 22% were from the San Gabriel Valley and 7.4% were from other areas of Los Angeles County.
More than 48% said they used the airport less than once a month, but almost 10% said they used it once a week or more.
New Terminal Wanted
When asked what changes they wanted, almost 17% requested a new terminal. The existing terminal, 55 years old, is scheduled to be replaced in the 1990s.
More than 13% asked for more flights, and 11% requested more parking spaces.
Richard Close, president of the Sherman Oaks Homeowners Assn. and spokesman for an anti-noise coalition of six homeowner groups in the San Fernando Valley, asked the researchers presenting the report whether they had calculated decreases in the value of property in the area, noise pollution and neighborhood "decay."
"Or did you just measure the pluses, and not the minuses?" Close asked.
Researchers said they did not look for economically harmful effects. Airport manager T. E. Greer responded that previous studies had found "no measureable difference whatsoever in property values around the airport," compared to changes in property values elsewhere in Burbank and the San Fernando Valley.
Close later complained to an airport official that the survey was akin to "demonstrating the economic benefits of cancer because it provides jobs for doctors and hospital workers."