YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Governor Urges Taxpayer Rebate : $700 Million of $2.7 Billion in Extra Funds Would Be Returned

May 20, 1987|DOUGLAS SHUIT | Times Staff Writer

SACRAMENTO — Confirming that soaring tax revenues will generate an extra $2.7 billion for the state over the next 14 months, Gov. George Deukmejian proposed on Tuesday giving $700 million of the financial bonanza back to California taxpayers while boosting spending on education, toxics control and the battle against AIDS.

Just how the rebate would work, or how much each taxpayer might expect, was uncertain. Estimates of the average refund each taxpayer would receive ranged from $42 to $60.

"Thanks to our economic strength and some unexpected tax collections due to the new federal tax reform, the state will receive substantially more revenues than anyone expected last December," Deukmejian announced in a taped address made available to radio and television stations around the state.

The tax rebate proposal, which drew immediate criticism in the Legislature, is the result of increasing expenditures that for the first time have driven the state past the spending limit approved overwhelmingly by voters in 1979, Deukmejian said. The rebate is necessary, the Administration contends, because the state is taking in more revenue than it can legally spend.

Limited Options

Under the spending limit, the state has a limited number of options in deciding what to do with surplus revenue. It can spend the money to retire voter-approved bonded indebtedness, give the money to local government agencies, like school districts, or return it to taxpayers.

In deciding to return it to taxpayers, Deukmejian defended the spending limit, saying his action "keeps faith with the people."

"By passing (the spending limit), the people wisely placed a limit on the overall growth of government at all levels in California. Elected officials have a responsibility to listen to the people and try to make this initiative measure work," Deukmejian said.

The tax rebate plan drew fire from critics, who said the $700 million would be better spent on elementary and high school education programs. These critics say the state would not be legally required to rebate the money if it were put into education, because local school boards are far below their own legal spending limits.

Deukmejian has said, however, that he considers such proposals to be efforts to thwart the will of the voters who passed the spending limit initiative.

The governor's rebate proposal coincides with clamoring from school districts up and down the state for more financial aid. Educators said severe budget problems have led to teacher strikes or threatened strikes over low pay, caused them to stock classrooms with outdated textbooks and may lead to fewer academic offerings in the next school year.

Two months ago Deukmejian vetoed a $76.2-million emergency school funding bill, citing a lack of money to pay for it.

Deukmejian's announcement Tuesday indicated that he intends to earmark about $200 million of the surplus revenue for public school programs.

The proposal was immediately denounced by state Supt. of Public Instruction Bill Honig, who has been fighting Deukmejian for more education funding since January.

Honig said he will plead with the Legislature to reject Deukmejian's proposal.

'Money From Children'

"I'm confident that Californians don't want to take money from children to give a short-term rebate of a few dollars to people in California," Honig declared during a Capitol news conference.

Honig, challenging Deukmejian's commitment to public school funding and the governor's frequent statement that education is his "top priority," said the plan announced Tuesday does not give schools their "fair share" of revenues, as the governor had promised.

"We aren't getting our fair share," said Honig, who is sponsoring legislation that would increase spending on kindergarten through high school education programs by $900 million.

Honig noted that the $700 million earmarked for a tax rebate, when added to the $200 million Deukmejian indicated he would add to education spending, would total the $900 million Honig needs to fund his financial aid package for the upcoming fiscal year.

Honig has two powerful allies in the Legislature, Assembly Speaker Willie Brown (D-San Francisco) and Senate President Pro Tem David A. Roberti (D-Los Angeles).

Both Democratic leaders, in reacting to the governor's announcement, cited estimates by legislative fiscal committee staff that the governor's $700-million rebate proposal would amount, on the average, to about a $42 rebate for each of the state's 16 million taxpayers.

'Growing Public Demand'

Roberti said the amount of money the governor wants to use to pay for his rebate proposal would "provide $155 per student in additional support. The governor's $42 puts puts aside the growing public demand for meeting the needs of education."

Brown said, "The governor's plan must be considered along with Mr. Honig's plea on behalf of public education. Maybe we should give the taxpayers a choice--$42 or better, safer schools."

Los Angeles Times Articles