Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsPsychology

What's the Attraction Here? : Most-Talked-About Film of Year Stirs Strong Emotions About Basic Human Values

October 15, 1987|CONNIE BENESCH and DEBORAH CAULFIELD

It's been called an anti-feminist film, a "yuppie slasher" movie, an advertisement for safe sex and fidelity, as well as a diatribe against being single. In some cases, it's been called unmitigated rot.

Like it or not, "Fatal Attraction," the Michael Douglas-Glenn Close-Anne Archer thriller about the scary aftermath of a man's extramarital fling, has become the most talked-about movie released this year. The feelings it has elicited make it one of the most thought-provoking and--to some--disturbing movies of the decade.

A psychologist says the film draws out the "latent mistrust" that sometimes separates men and women, and the director of the film says he is baffled by the public's reaction.

"It's quite extraordinary," director Adrian Lyne said in a telephone interview. "I wasn't prepared for how much of an audience-participation movie it was going to be. In the last act, the reaction is so vocal."

In California theaters, audiences have been known to erupt with spontaneous hisses, boos and cheers in reaction to gruesome scenes or the villain's behavior or in support of the film's heroine.

Times interviews with moviegoers in Westwood, Hollywood and other locales indicate that emotions continue to run high after the movie ends as well. "Fatal Attraction" seems to have left men and women seeing their worst fears of marital infidelity or psychological imbalance confirmed on the screen even as, in some instances, it has provoked them to think about their personal relationships.

"If you look at the surface of the film," said David Hamilton, 36, of Los Angeles, "it says that the couple that kills together stays together. It's the ultimate yuppie-fascist film."

In contrast, West Hollywood model Marja Sundquist said: "It made me feel sort of good. I liked the idea of keeping the family together. There was a lot of love in the movie."

In the movie, successful attorney Dan Gallagher (Douglas) has, ostensibly, everything a married man could want. He has a loving wife, Beth (Archer), a precocious child, a big old dog and a prestigious job.

Even so, when his wife and daughter leave for a weekend, he takes a previously innocent flirtation with a charming and attractive business associate, Alex Forrest (Close), to the limit, spending two sex-saturated days with her.

Trouble starts when it becomes apparent that Close--whose mental state degenerates through the course of the action--has no intention of letting Douglas walk away from the encounter. Her "fatal attraction" to him ends up threatening to finish off his marriage and his family--something Douglas clearly did not expect from what he thought would be a harmless dalliance.

While several moviegoers interviewed found it refreshing to have Close play a psychotic-type role typically reserved for males, many single women were offended.

"I felt that it depicted the successful, single, intelligent career woman as being psychologically unhinged," said San Francisco actress Carolyn Gregory, 34, in a telephone interview. "On the other hand, the faithful devoted wife and mother symbolized emotional stability."

West Los Angeles free-lance accountant Carolyn Hench went further. "It upset me so much. It was so extreme. I didn't like it," the 32-year-old single woman said. "The whole movie took the side of the man. The audience definitely empathized with him."

As for Close, Hench said "her actions embarrassed me. She was off-the-wall."

USC filmprofessor Marcia Kinder called the film "a clear attack on women's sexuality, the independent woman and the career woman. It seems quite hateful."

Some men agreed.

"I'm a male and I'm incensed by this film. . . . The film is all from his point of view. The film takes his side completely," pointed out USC film associate professor Drew Casper.

"Women, you should be very incensed by it," suggested Casper. "The woman comes off as a monster. The woman is hideous, a Medusa-like figure."

However, for other single males, Close's character brought back memories of troubled women they'd personally encountered.

"It just rang so true," said John Hilbert, 29, an attorney who recently moved to Westwood from Louisiana. "It reminded me of an old girlfriend who scared the hell out of me," he said. "It brought back the nightmares of the relationship. She got very violent."

But, Hilbert added, "I know guys who are just as crazy."

Married women interviewed also had feelings triggered by the film, and it led them to think about their own marriages.

Terry Smith, 33, an executive secretary at Hughes Aircraft's Space and Communications Group in Torrance, said: "It deeply affected me. It troubled me all the next day. Having daughters in the same age range (as the child in the movie)--when Alex (Close) took the kid out of school--well, that's one of my biggest fears."

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|