YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Eviction, Suits Threatened in W. Hollywood Hotel Dispute

September 29, 1988|RON RUSSELL | Times Staff Writer

A long dispute between the city of West Hollywood and hotelier Severyn Ashkenazy grew more rancorous this week, with the two sides swapping accusations while raising the prospect of a costly legal confrontation.

Ashkenazy accused the City Council of "acting in bad faith" in rejecting a proposal that would have allowed his financially troubled company to convert four apartment buildings to hotels in exchange for a promise to pay the city $4.9 million over the next 20 years.

And the hotelier threatened to evict "in short order" about three dozen tenants of the buildings unless progress is made soon to resolve the conflict.

"We have been as conciliatory as possible, and yet the city persists in trying to get something for nothing, using us as a whipping boy, and we don't intend to let that continue," he said. "We will be evicting people in short order unless there is some sign of progress. We have no other choice."

However, City Councilman John Heilman warned that if any tenants are evicted, Ashkenazy "will do so at his own peril," and City Manager Paul Brotzman indicated that the city will seek a restraining order, if necessary, to prevent any evictions.

Outside Attorney Retained

"The City Council has made itself clear as to its interest in protecting those tenants. . . . We would not sit idly by without doing all that we can under the law to prevent that from happening," Brotzman said.

Meanwhile, Brotzman announced that the city has retained an outside attorney to help prepare for a possible lawsuit against Ashkenazy Enterprises Inc., and that a full-time researcher devoted exclusively to the Ashkenazy matter will be hired soon.

"We've been instructed by the council to be prepared to negotiate to the extent that it is possible while preparing for litigation in the event that further negotiations fail, and that's exactly what we're doing," he said.

Since it became a city in 1984, West Hollywood has opposed Ashkenazy's attempts to convert the apartment buildings, located in residential neighborhoods, into small luxury hotels, contending that the conversions are illegal.

Since the five-member council unanimously turned down the proposed settlement three weeks ago after widespread public opposition, there have been no formal meetings between city officials and Ashkenazy's representatives, and none have been scheduled, Brotzman said.

"The attorneys (for each side) have talked some over the phone. So far that's been about it," he said.

The proposal, hammered out during 18 months of private talks between city officials and Ashkenazy's representatives, had been opposed by the tenants and others who said the city would have been buckling under to Ashkenazy if it allowed hotels in residential areas.

The agreement would have sanctioned hotel status for Le Parc, 733 W. Knoll Drive; Le Dufy, 1000 Westmount Drive; Le Reve, 8822 Cynthia St., and Valadon, 900 Hammond St. Le Parc has operated as a hotel since 1979, when the last of its residential tenants moved out, company officials said.

As part of the deal, Ashkenazy Enterprises agreed not to use the Ellis Act to evict remaining tenants in three of the properties until 1991. The company would have provided hefty relocation fees for tenants who were then forced to leave. But it rejected the idea of allowing tenants to stay on indefinitely in any of the four hotels once the conversions take place.

'Grand Opening' Gala

Relations between Ashkenazy and the city, which have seldom been friendly, have been especially strained since the council vote, and were not helped by the company's decision to go ahead with a gala "grand opening" of the Valadon as a hotel on Wednesday.

To add insult to injury, as far as some city officials were concerned, Ashkenazy's representatives sent invitations to Brotzman and each of the council members, and even invited Mayor Helen Albert to cut the ceremonial ribbon.

The invitations were accompanied by small gifts, including a wristband, headband and golfer's hat, touting the Valadon--which has about a dozen residential tenants--as the newest of the company's nine hotel properties.

Albert, who informed company representatives that she would not attend, called the invitations "bizarre under the circumstances. . . . It's almost like he's (Ashkenazy) thumbing his nose at us."

The Valadon, like the other disputed properties, was built in the 1970s with approval of the county as a so-called mixed-use building. It contains 110 units designated for hotel use and 35 units designated as apartments.

The company contends that the county's approval simply prohibited additional apartment units because of parking deficiencies and did not preclude conversion of apartments to hotel units. The city maintains otherwise, claiming the conversions constitute an "illegal nonconforming use.

Ashkenazy Enterprises filed for bankruptcy in 1986. Since then, it sold the Valadon to two Illinois savings and loans, which were among its creditors, although the company continues to manage it.

Los Angeles Times Articles