YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

'Flirting With Energy Chaos'

November 29, 1988

Your proposal to raise gas taxes by 25 cents to cut consumption is way, way off the mark. For most U.S. drivers a 25-cent increase in the cost of gasoline would be a nuisance tax, not a disincentive.

The following table of gas taxes in the Western world in 1987 illustrates the point: United States, 29 cents; Australia, 65 cents; West Germany, $1.34; United Kingdom, $1.53; France, $2.32; Japan, $1.47; Denmark, $2.93; Italy, $2.78.

It would appear, then, that an increase of $1 or $2 in the gas tax would be needed to create a disincentive to gasoline consumption.

The reason of course, is that a 25-cent increase is marginal to other costs of operating a car: insurance, taxes, maintenance, parking and the number of commute miles to and from work.

And, of course, a $1 gasoline tax increase would be politically impossible, especially if you are a good lip reader.

So forget about the short-term possibilities. Let's go for fuel efficient cars. From 1973 to 1985 gasoline consumption dropped 20 billion gallons a year as a result of increasing miles-per-gallon efficiency. But U.S. cars are still the least fuel-efficient in the Western world.


Pacific Palisades

Los Angeles Times Articles