YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Full-Court Press in Inglewood Election Fight : Council to Seek New Appeal of Ruling That Annuled '87 Race for Council Seat

March 12, 1989|SEBASTIAN ROTELLA | Times Staff Writer

Two years and two court decisions after a bitter campaign for Inglewood's 4th District council seat, the Inglewood City Council has decided the fight should continue in the courts rather than at the polls.

The council followed the lead of a defiant Inglewood Mayor Edward Vincent in voting 3 to 0 to appeal the state District Court of Appeal ruling upholding the annulment of Councilman Ervin (Tony) Thomas' election and ordering a new vote

Tuesday's council decision delays any rematch between Thomas and Garland Hardeman, his opponent in the June, 1987, election, until at least September.

Lawyers for the city will ask the appellate court to reconsider the October, 1987, ruling of Superior Court Judge Leon Savitch. If that fails, the city will seek review by the state Supreme Court.

After the city made its decision, Thomas, who abstained during the vote, said he would also appeal the court ruling. Hardeman said he in turn would ask the court to declare him the winner, an appeal that was earlier rejected.

'Grave Injustice'

It would be the first Inglewood case to reach the state Supreme Court since 1972, but lawyers on both sides have said Supreme Court review is not likely.

Nevertheless, Vincent, who is Thomas' political sponsor and a central figure in the election case, said the appeal is imperative. "The courts have done this city a grave injustice," he said Tuesday. "I have personally been done a grave injustice by innuendo, allegations and outright lies. . . ."

And for the first time, Vincent said he can disprove the courts' findings that he intimidated voters and invaded their right to a secret ballot during an aggressive absentee ballot drive for Thomas. Vincent said that at a press conference next week he will produce evidence countering those charges and prove "beyond a shadow of a doubt" that he mailed absentee ballots that the courts have ruled were illegally hand-delivered to the polls.

Hardeman, who had urged council members to permit a new election, criticized further appeals as a waste of taxpayers' money. He called Vincent's promise to disprove the courts' findings a "political stunt."

"It's too late," Hardeman said. "These aren't accusations. They've been substantiated by evidence. Two courts have believed them."

While the city's lawyers have sided with Vincent, City Atty. Howard Rosten said the mayor's new material can play no part in the appeal.

14 Ballots Voided

In his 1987 ruling, Savitch invalidated 14 ballots that he said were illegally hand-delivered to the city clerk's office. The judge discounted Vincent's testimony that he mailed the ballots. Savitch ruled four other votes illegal because of intimidation of voters and invasion of ballot secrecy after voters testified Vincent solicited absentee votes at their homes. In two of those cases, voters said Vincent punched their ballots for them. Another vote was thrown out because city election officials improperly allowed Vincent, a Thomas campaign worker, to take a replacement absentee ballot to the voter instead of sending it with an impartial election official.

The appellate court ruling last week praised Savitch's handling of the complex case.

Vincent had angry words Tuesday for the courts and Hardeman--a Los Angeles police officer whose lawsuit overturned the election and who has expressed interest in running for mayor in 1990.

Vincent repeated his contention that Hardeman did not actually live in the 4th District during the election, a charge that both the Superior Court and appellate court dismissed.

In an interview in his City Hall office, Vincent said Hardeman's continuing campaign for the seat has shown that Hardeman is unfit for the City Council and has lost Hardeman former allies including Councilmen Anthony Scardenzan and Daniel Tabor, who both joined Vincent in voting for an appeal.

'Unbecoming' Conduct

"I'm interested in keeping him out of office permanently," Vincent said. "His conduct at council meetings has been unbecoming of a police officer and of a city councilman."

Hardeman has periodically addressed council meetings on the case and other city issues, styling himself a "de facto councilman." Thomas remains in his seat pending appeals.

During a recent confrontation at a council meeting, Vincent summoned police officers to have Hardeman arrested after Hardeman applauded a statement criticizing the mayor and city administrators. After several tense moments, the officers did not arrest Hardeman and allowed him to remain at the meeting.

Los Angeles Times Articles