YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Frank Zappa, Capitalist Rocker : Entrepreneurship: Zappa got title to his master recordings by suing his record company. Now he's making non-music deals with the Soviets.


Frank Zappa has long been known as a rock 'n' roll iconoclast, an outspoken, unconventional musician who earned the devotion of a moderate-sized following with records such as "Freak Out," "Weasels Ripped My Flesh" and "Sheik Yerbouti." But the former leader of the Mothers of Invention is also a shrewd businessman. "I don't have anything against making a profit," he said.

Zappa, who turns 49 on Thursday, always did part his hair differently than his more commercially successful contemporaries. But this year, while middle-aged rockers such as the Who, Paul McCartney and the Rolling Stones were reaffirming their popularity on high-profile concert tours, Zappa was smart enough to stay home. He hung up his road gear after he lost $400,000 on his self-financed 1988 tour.

"Everybody got paid but me," he said. Even though the four-month tour of the United States and Europe was 90% sold out, Zappa said the losses piled up because of high travel costs and salaries for the 12-piece band. There were 43 people in all, three buses and five trucks. "I had to pay the cost of all the airplane tickets, all the buses, all the food, all the per diems and salaries," Zappa said.

"That sort of dampens one's enthusiasm for going out there and doing it again," he said, adding that he's unwilling to accept financial backing from a corporate sponsor because it would mean hawking products such as beer or soft drinks.

But Zappa is hardly struggling. Like any other businessman, he's worked at cutting his overhead and he looks for new business opportunities where he can find them, some as distant as the Soviet Union. From offices in North Hollywood and his hilltop Laurel Canyon home, Zappa and his wife of 22 years, Gail, run several businesses: a record label, a mail-order company, a video company and a music publishing firm. All the businesses are 100%-owned by Zappa and his wife and he says they are profitable, although he remains tight-lipped about sales and earnings.

He owns the lucrative master tapes for many of his recordings, thanks to a lawsuit he filed against his former record company, Warner Bros. Records, and he slowly re-releases the old titles on compact discs. Much like an annuity, the money keeps coming from those re-releases. "My stuff sells year after year and the income from those sales goes to me," Zappa said.

It was a few years ago that Zappa and his wife decided to cut their overhead. They had employed managers, lawyers and accountants to run his music businesses. "After we started reading the contracts, we started to get smart and figured out maybe we could do it better," Gail Zappa said. "So I fired everyone and started over."

Since 1985 she has run the business end of things. "He's the artist and puts the product together. I handle all production aspects of it, the cover art and packaging. I make all the financial decisions."

And lately, the man who produced "Valley Girl," (the 1982 hit he made with his daughter, Moon, who immortalized a series of Val-slang phrases such as "Gag me with a spoon") has turned his sights to international trade and is brokering joint ventures in the Soviet Union, including a proposed deal to start a U.S.-Soviet business-oriented television show.

In the fickle world of pop music, Frank Zappa never achieved superstar status, though he did have a few certifiable hits. According to Billboard magazine, Zappa's three biggest singles were "Don't Eat the Yellow Snow," which reached No. 4 on the charts in 1974, "Dancin' Fool," which hit No. 8 in 1979, and, with Moon, "Valley Girl," No. 12 in 1982. But the recordings were labeled by Billboard as novelty songs, meaning "it's like the Singing Chipmunks, more or less tongue in cheek," said Kim Whitburn, a spokeswoman for Billboard's record research unit.

Zappa, however, concentrates on other numbers. He says artists can make lots more money by running their own record companies than by collecting royalties from someone else.

In 1983, Zappa sued Warner Bros. Records, alleging that Warner used questionable accounting methods to mislead him about royalties due from sales of his music, a practice he says is still common in the music business. Most artists don't take the time to closely scrutinize their contracts with record companies, Zappa said. But he wanted more control over the sales of his records.

When the suit was settled out of court, ownership of many of the masters reverted to him. Zappa said he spent about $1.6 million on the suit, but the steady sales of his old records are very lucrative. "I have albums that were released 10, 15, 20, 25 years ago that are selling substantial quantities in CD and cassette," he said.

Los Angeles Times Articles