Smog-free and potentially cheap, nuclear power would be far more prevalent if the public really believed that the industry was capable of controlling any potential accident. The fact that nuclear power does not enjoy that confidence is not an economic disaster since there are alternative forms of power. But the nation does not yet have a substitute for the petroleum needed to run much of its economic machine. For now, we are stuck with oil. Therefore, as the Exxon Valdez and the American Trader have demonstrated, we must do a better job of handling the millions of barrels of petroleum products the nation guzzles daily--from the moment the stuff comes out of the ground, or the ocean floor, to the point at which the last vapors flow from the exhaust pipe.
It's true that an oil spill does not carry the potential for mass human destruction that people fear--whether rationally or not--from a nuclear accident. Long-term environmental damage is bad enough, though. And fortunately, Americans have the technical skill to develop safeguards against major oil spills and adequate cleanup programs. But the people and their political leaders must demand that the job be done, and agree to pay the necessary cost.