YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Baseball '90 PREVIEW : It Can Be One Pitch From Over : Injuries: Despite medical advancements, pitchers live with pain and knowledge that the next pitch could be the last.


Since your arms are what used to be your front legs, it isn't surprising that several million years of evolution still haven't produced a limb capable of pitching in the major leagues without distress.

If adaptation produced a human being capable of heaving the occasional rock at a passing wildebeest, that is still different than trying to throw 120 pitches at 90 m.p.h. within 2 1/2 hours, let alone with sliders mixed in.

The slider, the pitcher's ace in the hole, is relatively easy to control, hard to pick up and hell on the practitioner's elbow. Thus he is afforded the classic dilemma, as enunciated by Ken Brett, the Angel announcer who became a good pitcher when he began throwing sliders, but felt it every time he threw one:

"If I wanted to keep from working 9 to 5, I had to keep throwing it."

He hung in 14 seasons despite constant discomfort.

He says he'd do it over again, too.

Not that there weren't worse things one could do to one's one and only pitching arm. "King" Carl Hubbell made a noble name for himself throwing the screwball, which called for him to snap his elbow down in an even more unnatural way--facing outward. In retirement, Hubbell's elbow faces outward and remains bent, permanently.

For a pitcher, the strain on his elbow is rivaled only by that placed on his shoulder. Legions of pitchers had what was for decades vaguely called "a sore arm." It was akin to bearing the mark of Cain. With few exceptions, sore-armed pitchers didn't come back.

To pitch was to be outwardly stoic, to worry inwardly about the frailty of this limb which one would so over-exercise, to hide one's distress lest management begin to look him over and write him off, to go out there regardless of how it feels. If a pitcher waited until he felt fine, the credo went and still goes, he might never pitch.

Brett, struggling with his chronically sore elbow in the mid-'70s, at the zenith of his career at age 25 in Pittsburgh, was called aside by Willie Stargell who recommended a local acupuncturist.

Brett went and got great relief.

He says he told the Pirate trainer, who told him to keep going but not to let him know anything about it.

Thus did the conspiracy endure. Pitchers gritted their teeth, found comfort where they could and hung on for dear life.

Medical science was just getting interested.

If Alejandro Pena had reported the same problem in his right shoulder in 1980 that he did in the middle of the decade, he'd have likely undergone major surgery on his right rotator cuff.

Instead, he underwent arthroscopic surgery. If Pena never regained his pre-surgery form, at least he went back to throwing hard.

If Fernando Valenzuela had reported the same problem in his left shoulder--actually Valenzuela had to be dragooned into admitting that it hurt--in 1986 rather than 1988, he might have undergone arthroscopic surgery.

Instead, he was put on a strengthening program. In his first season back, 1989, the one in which pitchers often struggle, he started slowly but finished well: 10-9 in his last 23 starts, with a 2.96 ERA. The Dodger orthopedist, Frank Jobe, expects the curve to keep going up this season.

It was Jobe who became famous by taking a tendon from the 32-year-old Tommy John's wrist in 1975 and using it to rebuild John's left elbow. John subsequently worked 13 more seasons and was still casting about this spring, trying to find work at age 45.

Jobe was trying to do similar pioneering work in rotator cuff surgery in the early '80s, but with more problems.

Of course, rotator cuff surgery was the hot procedure of its time. A few years before, few laymen had ever heard the term.

Forthwith, a brief history:

"A lot of it had to do with being more clear-cut with our definitions," Jobe says. "I think we had rotator cuff injuries before, but we'd always say, 'He threw his shoulder out.' Or 'sore-armed pitcher.'

"In those days, it was sort of a general sense that if you had a surgical scar on your arm or your shoulder, you were through.

"We didn't have any good tools to work with. We didn't have the specialized X-ray studies. It was just in those days that we began to do arthrograms (inserting a needle-like probe, through which one could see into a joint). We didn't understand the forces in the shoulder. We knew it was a semi-ball-and-socket, that it was very loose, had a lot of range of motion. We knew it was hard to pick up subtle changes. If it dislocated, we knew we had to fix that but we didn't know how to pick up subtle instability.

"As you recall, we used to operate on a lot of rotator cuffs about 8-10 years ago. And we could not make heads or tails out of why some of them got well and went back to pitching, and some of them didn't. It didn't correlate to the size of the tear or anything I could put my finger on.

"At that point, I just said, 'Well, I don't understand rotator cuff injuries.' "

In 1988, Jobe published a study in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, admitting it.

Los Angeles Times Articles