Can you tell me why in "The Eye Thinks" you felt it necessary to print the nude picture for any reason other than sheer titillation and controversy?
The female pubic area may be lovely to gaze upon, but not in a so-called family-newspaper magazine. And for that matter, why not print the male counterpart under the guise of "artistic merit," so you at least give equal space to those wishing to partake of the beauty of that vision, too.
This is not any kind of censorship letter, by the way. But this photograph seems totally out of place in this context, in this article and in this publication.