Advertisement
 
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsReporters
(Page 2 of 2)

NEWS ANALYSIS : War Reporting Suffers From Shortage of Facts : Media: Little solid information is available on Iraqi aircraft, missile strength in the wake of air strikes.

January 19, 1991|DAVID SHAW | TIMES STAFF WRITER

Hussein had promised to destroy Israel. But he sent fewer than a dozen missiles on the first attack Thursday night. None--apparently--was equipped with the kinds of chemical or biological weapons that he had previously used to kill thousands of Kurds in his own country. Only a handful of Israelis were injured by the first missile attack, none seriously.

Did Hussein, for all his bluster, not have chemical or biological payloads that could be delivered on Scud missiles? Or had his missile-launching capacity been so severely damaged by the early attacks that he could muster no stronger attack? Or was he just trying to husband his military resources, to use the least possible armaments and still lure Israel into the war, in hopes of getting Arab countries to abandon the United States? Was he just firing preliminary missiles, trying to find the range for later, more destructive attacks? And just how many missiles and mobile launchers did he have?

No one knew.

Reporters were becoming so desperate for hard information that when Lt. Gen. Tom Kelly briefed them at the Pentagon on Friday and said he didn't know if the Iraqis had any American prisoners of war, one reporter said, "So you would discount the reports from Iraq. . . . "

Kelly had to interrupt to point out that he had not said he "discounted" reports that the Iraqis had captured American fliers, only that he didn't know if that had happened.

He didn't know. No one knew. That was the theme of the first 48 hours of the war in the gulf.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|