Advertisement
 
(Page 5 of 5)

O.C. Supervisors Rely on Developers to Win : Campaign finances: The building industry's share of donations to board members--42%--dwarfs all other interests, and is unmatched in other political arenas.

DOLLAR POLITICS: County Supervisors' Biggest Donors. One in an occasional series.

October 27, 1991|JIM NEWTON and MARK LANDSBAUM | TIMES STAFF WRITERS

"Those numbers are staggering. . . . The danger is obvious. When you're dependent on one industry for (nearly) half of your contributions, that's extraordinary. It certainly suggests that you'd think twice before offending that industry."

Larry Thomas, the Irvine Co.'s vice president for corporate communications

"We have what I would probably characterize as a corporate ethic of activism in public affairs. We give to candidates who stand for ideas that we share as a general philosophy."

Development, Real Estate Contributions Dominate

Candidates for county supervisor, especially incumbents, turn more often to the development and real estate industry for their political contributions than they do to any other source.

Top Development and Real Estate Donors

Leading campaign contributors who work in or represent real estate or land development businesses.

Building Industry Assn.: $48,005

* William Cooper: $38,405

Shapell Industries: $36,469

Irvine Co.: $32,191

Mission Viejo Co.: $30,563

William Lyon Co.: $30,214

J.M. Peters Co.: $27,847

Baldwin Co.: $27,815

Pacesetter Homes Pacesetter Real Estate Group: $27,636

Hon Development Co.: $25,883

* Cooper is a local executive with mortgage and real estate interests, but unlike other contributors on this list, his political contributions were personal, not corporate.

Note: Contributions by employees of these companies are not included in their totals.

Incumbents Benefit Most

Development interests, like most contributors, rarely gamble on a challenger. Instead they overwhelmingly give to incumbents

Development money to incumbents: $2,914,247

Development money to challengers: $191,002

* Contributions to the 1986 campaign for an open seat on the board are not included.

Disney's Dollars

Disneyland and its parent firm, the Walt Disney Co., make big contributions in Washington and Sacramento, but they're stingier with the Board of Supervisors.

14 years of Disneyland contributions to Orange County supervisor candidates.*: $15,050

4 years of Walt Disney Co. to U.S. Sen. Bill Bradley of New Jersey.*: 78,040

* Both include Disney employee contributions.

"Housewives" Favor...

Contributors who are identified only as "housewives" have made their overwhelming candidate of choice Harriett M. Wieder, the only woman ever elected to the board.

Wieder: $21,491

All other candidates during the past 14 years: $15,928

All four sitting supervisors combined: $8,947

Total "housewife" contributions: $46,366

Irvine Heiress

She is identified in disclosure statements by a variety of titles, including "homemaker," but millionaire Joan Irvine Smith has long been willing to make generous campaign contributions to supervisorial candidates.

Joan Irvine Smith Total contributions to board candidates: $14,423

Supervisors And Development Industry Contributions

All five supervisors receive a sizeable portion of their campaign contributions from development interests over the past 14 years.

Thomas F. Riley: 57.8%

Development money: $564,775

Roger R. Stanton: 46.5%

Development money: $262,170

Gaddi H. Vasquez: 40.5%

Development money: $210,830

Harriett M. Wieder: 39.4%

Development money: $555,721

Don R. Roth: 39.4%

Development money: $495,081

Note: Riley has served on the board the longest, followed by Wieder, Stanton, Roth and Vasquez, in that order.

Source: Campaign disclosure statements, 1977-91

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|