Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

National Agenda : Trouble in Paradise? Venezuelans Sense It : Prosperity and democracy aren't enough to overcome the national malaise--or fears of another coup.

October 13, 1992|KENNETH FREED | TIMES STAFF WRITER

CARACAS, Venezuela — Computer store owner Julio Armaz, 37, is a disillusioned man. He sees nothing but hardship for himself and political and economic disaster for Venezuela. "The way things are going," he says, "we're going to see a military dictatorship. To tell you the truth, that could be a good thing."

Ironically, business has seldom been better for Armaz, or his lifestyle more opulent. His weekends are divided between his condominium in Miami and his beach house on Venezuela's Caribbean coast. He eats several nights a week at Caracas' varied and plentiful international restaurants. He drives a German luxury car.

Yet, he complained as he served coffee in the sunny patio of his elegant townhouse in the hills overlooking the capital, "life is a mess. Prices are too high, services are poor, the politicians are corrupt. We've lost what you Americans call the 'moral center.' Why, I haven't had water (service) for nearly a week."

That same sense of discontent, even whining in the midst of plenty describes Venezuela as a whole.

On the one hand, this is a country with one of the world's highest rates of economic growth, and one of Latin America's longest democratic traditions. It has a large middle class, a relatively low unemployment rate, a wonderful climate and huge reserves of oil. Yet, seven months ago, Venezuela barely survived a clumsy attempted military coup. And today it faces the prospect of potentially violent street disorder, political gridlock and, possibly, another coup and a military government.

"We've created a situation for fascism or authoritarianism," said Arturo Uslar Pietri, who at age 84 is one of Venezuela's most venerable politicians and writers. "It is very difficult to see the future, but what is certain is that it can't go on like this."

Looking at key economic measures, it is difficult for an outsider to understand the pessimism. Real economic growth last year averaged 10.5%, the highest in Latin America and one of the best records in the world. The rate for the first half of this year was 8.5%. The U.S. growth rate for the same time was under 2%.

Unemployment, now at 8.4%, is dropping steadily. Inflation is at 30%, down from 81% two years ago and far below the soaring price increases that mark Brazil, South America's largest and most powerful economy.

A combination of government austerity, privatization of government-owned businesses and a reduction of tariffs has seriously reduced the federal deficit and opened Venezuela to foreign goods, particularly consumer products. Another bright spot is foreign investment--$555 million worth just in the first six months of 1992.

And, of course, there is oil. Venezuela holds some of the world's largest reserves, pumping an average of more than 2.3 million barrels a day, with plans to increase that amount by stages to 3.3 million barrels a day by 1998.

"From an economic point of view," said a diplomat, "things couldn't be better. There is an economic boom. They have a long democratic tradition, there are no outside threats, the society is opening up. But I have to admit the country sits on the edge of self-destruction."

It almost fell over that edge last February when a small group of mid-level army officers attempted a takeover, including the proposed murder of President Carlos Andres Perez. The revolt was crushed in 12 hours when senior military officers rallied the troops, rushed Perez out of danger and captured the rebel leader, Lt. Col. Hugo Chavez.

Although a democratic system has been in place since 1958, there was a notable lack of public opposition to the coup attempt: There were no street demonstrations nor rallying of the political leadership on Perez's behalf.

And afterward, the streets were taken over by anti-government student demonstrations, then protests by middle-class women banging pots and pans and efforts by political leaders--even members of Perez's own political party, Action Democratica--to destabilize his administration.

Within a month, even the generals who had saved Perez were considering their own coup, according to diplomatic and military sources. But "it was made clear that the United States wouldn't tolerate a coup," one diplomat said, "and that the economic consequences would be disastrous."

How did a country with Venezuela's comparative advantages make its way to the political abyss? The answers run from the historical to the personal.

According to Uslar, the reasons are rooted in the country's colonial past, which "started with the paternalism of the ruling country and led to the paternalism of a strong, even authoritarian government after independence."

Even after Venezuela turned finally to democracy in 1958, the government remained highly centralized, with a strong president and relatively week legislature. In fact, the country will begin electing governors and mayors this year for the first time--until now they've been appointed by the president.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|