Advertisement
 
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Fissures Under the Crust : BLACK DOGS, By Ian McEwan (Doubleday: $19.50; 149 pp.)

December 20, 1992|Ariel Swartley | Swartley writes about books and popular culture

The anticipatory chill begins with the title, "Black Dogs." Fans of Ian McEwan's fiction know better than to envision cuddly house pets. Hounds of the general size and ferocity of the Baskerville beasts would be more likely. In four previous novels and two short-story collections, the 44-year-old Briton has proven himself to be a master of menace, an excavator of the jagged fissures that lie just under civilization's crust. McEwan's menaces often take the form of actual dismemberment and sexual perversity. The civilization is all in his prose: an eminently British combination of lucid syntax and detached compassion.

"Black Dogs," however, begins with disconcerting gentleness. A pleasantly tweedy narrator, who in the superficial details of gender, age, nationality, profession and number of children resembles McEwan, reminisces about his adolescent fascination with other people's parents by way of introducing his main subject: a portrait of his in-laws. In previous novels, "The Child in Time" and "The Innocent," McEwan evoked contemporary genres like "missing-child thriller" or "anti-hero spy novel" before bending them to his own purposes; in "Black Dogs," the writing is simple and confessional, the apparent frankness disarming.

Described by their son-in-law, Bernard and June Tramaine are admirable, articulate and infuriating--a kind of Everyparent, elder variety. Their oddity lies in their decades-long marriage, a union at once loving and irreconcilable, fruitful and desolate. Bernard, who became a communist as a young man, is now an Establishment figure, a former Member of Parliament and Labour Party stalwart. He is a rationalist, a secular humanist, a man who collects and mounts insects with scientific precision and still believes in the perfectibility of systems that deliver social welfare.

June, when the novel opens in 1987, is bedridden in a suburban English nursing home, suffering from an obscure form of cancer. In the solitude imposed by uncongenial surroundings, she reads and writes, trades wildflower lore with her doctor and dispenses pointed advice to her children, all with the serene authority of her spiritual mentor, Lao tzu.

In 1946 she had been as eager as Bernard to join the Party, but her faith was shattered by a traumatic experience during their honeymoon tour of France. One effect of the trauma was that she discovered God, and in time it became apparent that not only her politics but her life with Bernard could not survive her religious conversion.

To an activist and intellectual like Bernard, June's retreat into spirituality (amid the rustic comforts of a French farmhouse) is evidence of either massive self-indulgence or an elective lobotomy. To June, Bernard's life of sound and fury has resulted in the predictable emptiness: The suffering still suffer. Meanwhile, his plummy elder-statesman manner drives her wild.

No one is less forgiving of another's point of view than someone who hoped to change the world. But no one is more persistent, either. And so despite 35 years apart, their marriage survives--in a fashion. Instead of speaking to each other, they constantly lecture their family and anyone else who will listen on each other's errors of temperament and philosophy.

And the menacing dogs of McEwan's title? They're there from the beginning, slavering at the edges of the narrative, pounding through June's consciousness as she drops to sleep each night, the agents of her trauma, symbol of her satori--although, as McEwan's narrator warns, she would disagree: "No, you clot. Not symbolic! . . . Literal, anecdotal, true. Don't you know I was nearly killed!"

Unlike Henry James, who, abhorring banality, once described a neighbor's pet, also a black dog, as "something dark, something canine," McEwan finds the bald statement, the literal truth full enough of ambiguity.

Banality in fact fascinates McEwan, in particular the banality of evil, and part of the chill of his books comes from his ability to recount the most grisly events in cool and meticulously observed detail. Yet his is not the scientific detachment that collapses polarities, allowing good to become indistinguishable from evil. Rather he seems anxious to identify the cracked steps, the crucibles of experience that jolt individuals, for better or worse, out of their moral skins.

June's black dogs are one such crucible--a half-starved, feral legacy from the Gestapo whose forces--only two years before the Tramaines' honeymoon in the Languedoc--had terrorized these quiet villages.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|