* The Times' smug prediction of the certain winner of the 3rd District supervisor's race (Valley Newswatch, Jan. 3) left me questioning how fair your paper really is.
Absent from the paragraph touting Zev Yaroslavsky as the sure winner in a campaign only insomniacs would love is any mention at all of Yaroslavsky's worthy opponent Don Wallace.
Why was Wallace, who served nearly three years as field deputy for Supervisor Ed Edleman, completely ignored in the summary?
Why weren't Wallace's credentials as a credible candidate sung as loudly as Yaroslavsky's?
I would think that the people of the 3rd District would welcome news on someone with fresh ideas that challenge Yaroslavsky's worn-out and hollow political solutions.