"First, be cognizant that it takes taxpayer money to pay for these programs," he advised. "That's the real world. So they must meet harsh tests: Are they necessary? Bare bones? You're handing out free food, shelter, access to better medical plans than we have. I'm not at all against these programs, but you can't get resources for them; there's not great support in this country for them. That's the real world, just like there's not enough political will to move after pregnant women who use alcohol or cigarettes. There is, though, a political basis for this interagency program. Leaders can take a position against crack. Our legal system reflects our cultural mores. That's our system. That's the real world. . . ."
Condon stopped in mid-sentence, at the moment he reached the television cameras waiting at the courthouse steps. Instantly, he turned from his companion and hit his cue.
"The left-wing ACLU doesn't represent the American people," he began, leaning into the microphone. "The left-wing ACLU doesn't represent the people of South Carolina. MUSC deserves an award. If the plaintiff prevails, in effect we'd be legalizing the use of crack cocaine during pregnancy. . . ." Staring into the camera, Condon posed the enduring question that so grips Charleston: "Who is speaking for the babies in this courtroom?" he asked. "Who is speaking for the babies?"