Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Orange County Offers Recovery Plan to State

March 24, 1995|MATT LAIT and ERIC BAILEY | TIMES STAFF WRITERS

SACRAMENTO — Orange County officials on Thursday gave state legislators the most detailed bankruptcy recovery plan they have yet unveiled--a plan that even its creators described as risky and filled with legal pitfalls.

The proposal calls for raising trash dumping fees more than 50%, a cost that will be passed on to consumers countywide; increasing the county sales tax by half a cent and borrowing $1.25 billion with new bond issues.

And although it seeks no handout from the state, the plan does ask the Legislature to guarantee county loans and revise state laws, thereby allowing the county more freedom to borrow against future revenues.

Orange County Chief Executive Officer William Popejoy said that if the insolvent county can follow the recovery blueprint, "we believe (we) can get this terrible situation behind us."

But state officials expressed concern that the plan for digging out of $1.7 billion in investment losses was fraught with legal and political uncertainties.

"It's a fragile plan," said Sen. William Craven (R-Oceanside), co-chairman of the Senate panel.

Even Popejoy said the proposal may be difficult to enact.

"In some legal areas we're stretching the envelope," he conceded after presenting the plan to a special Senate committee probing the county's Dec. 6 bankruptcy filing, the largest by any government entity in U.S. history.

"We never said this was going to be easy," added Bruce Bennett, the county's bankruptcy attorney. "We understand that there is risk in many of the options. But we think the county has a fair shot of getting through all the problems."

Among the obstacles are environmental hurdles that could hinder the waste disposal plans, political difficulties in winning approval of the half-cent sales tax increase and the nagging reluctance of state lawmakers to embrace loan guarantees.

If the proposal went smoothly, Craven said, it would be akin to "a triple play that's better than Tinker to Evers to Chance."

Sen. Tom Hayden (D-Santa Monica) added: "It's still asking the state to bail out Orange County."

Not all the Senate panel members were as pessimistic.

*

"It's certainly at least better thought-out than anything we've seen so far," said Sen. Lucy Killea (I-San Diego), the committee's co-chairwoman. "Yeah, I think it's optimistic. But there's a greater sense of realism in the sense that they've lined everything up. It was very much piecemeal before."

The plan presented Thursday was the county's most detailed account yet on how it intends to move out of insolvency, though it offered few new proposals.

"The plan does do what they said it would do: It makes everyone whole," said Karen Krop, assistant vice president with Moody's Investors Service, a bond rating agency. "But the odds of getting it done are very difficult."

County officials identified four new revenue streams to help finance the recovery effort. Most the money would come from the half-cent sales tax increase and a plan to increase dumping fees at county landfills; the plan also counts on earning extra revenue by allowing neighboring counties to export 6,000 tons of trash a day to Orange County.

The county's precious surplus of landfill capacity would be very attractive to other Southern California counties--most notably San Diego County to the south--that are running short of landfill space. But the additional trash would reduce the life span of Orange County's facilities from 55 years to 47.

Under the plan, dumping fees at the landfills would increase from $22.75 per ton to $35, a prospect that worried some city officials.

"It would hurt Newport Beach badly," said Councilman John Hedges, who estimated that the increased dumping fees would cost the city $800,000 annually. "All of our refuse pickup is paid for directly out of the general fund. It's a terrible idea."

Seal Beach Mayor George Brown said the dumping fee increase was "just like passing a tax."

Seal Beach Councilwoman Gwen Forsythe also criticized the county's proposal, complaining that higher landfill fees would hurt cities that have embarked on recycling programs. One of the key advantages of those programs was that they cut city landfill costs. "Now, they go ahead and raise the fees," she said. "That's not the right way to handle this."

Under the county's plan, new bond proceeds and sales tax revenue would be used to come up with the $430 million that the county needs to redeem $1.1 billion of bonds that mature this summer. (The rest of that debt would be paid from the county's roughly $600-million share of what remains in the bankrupt investment pool.) The plan would also raise an amount equivalent to the $345 million that the county lost through its investment in the pool.

Still, because the county is racing against the clock and the solutions are complex and time-consuming, it seems unlikely that Orange County will come up with the cash it needs to pay off the debt coming due this summer.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|