Advertisement

Don't Mess With a Formula That Works

Superfund: An innovative approach to San Gabriel Valley water pollution is put at risk by proposed House amendments.

January 01, 1996|ESTEBAN E. TORRES, Rep. Esteban E. Torres (D-La Puente), a member of the House since 1983, serves on the Appropriations Committee and is deputy minority whip

Congress is considering Superfund amendments that would dangerously derail ground water cleanup efforts in the San Gabriel Valley.

The Superfund reform bill, HR 2500, now moving through the House, would undermine years of cooperation between public and private parties. The innovative solution already under way is just the type of cleanup effort we should be promoting--one that cuts the red tape and the cost. To keep this local success story on track, I have joined forces with my California colleagues Reps. Brian P. Bilbray (R-San Diego) and David Dreier (R-San Dimas) in an amendment that would protect the agreements reached under the current cleanup plan. As written, HR 2500 would allow an entirely new cleanup plan to be imposed, using revised standards. Our bipartisan amendment effort will benefit the people of Southern California in more ways than one.


Advertisement

Debate about reforming environmental laws often generates more fiery rhetoric than cool-headed insight. Too much time is wasted on pointing fingers and not enough on the constructive task of distinguishing between what works and what needs fixing. The saga of the San Gabriel Superfund cleanup is case in point. It's a lesson learned in our own backyard.

In 1984, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency placed four toxic areas in the San Gabriel Valley ground water basin on the Superfund's most hazardous waste sites. The basin, one of the largest underground aquifers in the United States, provides drinking water for more than 1 million residents and businesses in Southern California. The discovery of high contamination levels in the aquifer presented a massive urgent problem. Our aquifer gained the dubious distinction as the largest, most heavily polluted ground water basin in the nation.

Cleaning up this vital water source became a top priority. It has proved a daunting task. Clearly, the Superfund law was not designed to tackle situations as complex and extensive as that posed by the San Gabriel Basin site. Instead of helping to clean up lethal accumulations of waste, the law only encouraged lawyers to bill countless hours sorting out who should pay and how much. An additional complication was a tangle of bureaucracy responsibility for ground water quality in the 167-square-mile basin.

The basin saga had all the makings of an epic tragedy, but the latest chapters have been remarkably encouraging. Cleanup efforts under way have become a national model for faster, cheaper, smarter Superfund operations.

Los Angeles Times Articles
|