Advertisement
 
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsMovies

'Rex': Extinct on the Big Screen

Movies: Whoopi Goldberg is its star, but 'Theodore Rex' is destined for TV or video after infighting and a poor test-market run.

April 04, 1996|ELAINE DUTKA | TIMES STAFF WRITER

New Line Cinema had planned to release "Theodore Rex," a film pairing Whoopi Goldberg with an animatronic dinosaur, last Friday--four days after her critically acclaimed turn hosting the Academy Awards.

But the date came and went with no "Theodore Rex," which New Line says is now headed for TV or home video after an unsuccessful test-market theatrical run. The $33.5-million family comedy becomes one of the most expensive films in memory to virtually bypass the nation's cinemas.

"Though this movie isn't 'E.T.,' I find it hard to believe that it wouldn't hold its own against 'All Dogs Go to Heaven 2' and the Disney reissue of 'Oliver & Company,' " said executive producer Stefano Ferrari, who invested $14 million of his family's pharmaceuticals fortune into his first major feature film and had to defend himself against five lawsuits filed in its wake.

According to the studio, the film had a "disappointing" run in February in cities including Las Vegas; Des Moines; Providence, R.I.; and Portland, Me. In a strategy aimed at recouping New Line's $5-million investment for domestic rights, the movie is tentatively scheduled to surface on home video on July 2, and may surface on cable, pay per view or a broadcast network even sooner. (The rest of the budget came from pre-selling the film internationally.)

"No one likes to be told that their child isn't beautiful enough for theatrical release, but that's a fact of life," said Mitch Goldman, head of marketing and distribution for New Line. "In the end, the prints and advertising investment for a theatrical run seemed greater than the box-office promise. We're fans of Whoopi's but felt that this isn't the right movie to grab her audience's attention. It would be irresponsible to our owners to throw money down the drain."

If Goldberg's Oscar night gig celebrated all that was right with Hollywood, her "Theodore Rex" experience epitomized many of the things that can go wrong. After verbally committing to the project in October 1992, the star attempted to back out. Settling a $20-million breach-of-contract suit out of court, she agreed to do the movie for $7 million the following fall.

Still, the production was far from problem-free.

After run-ins with Goldberg and the filmmakers, producer Richard Abramson relinquished his day-to-day duties before pre-production. And once shooting started, tensions ran high, according to several people involved in the film. Goldberg's ex-business partner, Larry Finch, was banned from the set--as was Ferrari when the actress was around.

"Life is too short," Abramson said this week. "The budget was tight, relationships were strained, and I had second thoughts about going into a situation with an unhappy star."

Goldberg was traveling and unavailable for comment, according to her press representative.

When shooting finally concluded, the film was only a few days and $300,000 over budget. But after one downbeat rough-cut preview in June of 1995, New Line asked the filmmakers to trim some of the more violent segments and rewrite some dinosaur dialogue to clarify the plot.

In September, the revised movie was previewed in Orange County. While New Line said the results were disappointing, others involved with the film reported a more positive response. When the studio pushed the movie back from Thanksgiving to Christmas, sources close to the film theorized that it was an attempt to please Goldberg. In the settlement, the actress had given up a percentage of the profits, at which point, some suspect, she decided to bury the film.

A New Line press spokesman denied such strategy on the part of Goldberg, as well as the claim that the actress agreed to sign on to another New Line project on the implicit condition that "Rex" be undermined. The star has not committed to appear in any pictures for the studio, said a spokesman. "Voodoo Dreams"--an 18th century period film bio-picture to which she committed a few years back--is no longer even on the development slate, he said.

New Line's Goldman was even more emphatic. "We have money invested and wouldn't flush a movie for any reason other than the movie itself--even for the opportunity to work with Whoopi," he said. "This movie hasn't been buried . . . nor will it be. We're just finding the right niche. Though this is the first time New Line has adopted this strategy, it's quite common industrywide. As for skewing the numbers, we don't have a smoke-filled room as in many of the major studios. We're probably the most open company when it comes to the research process."

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|