Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Work & Careers | SHOP TALK

Notice, Severance Pay Not Required by Law

April 21, 1996

ALSO:

- Raises Are Up to the Employer

- An Applicant's Age Might Apply

- Benefits for Spouse Who Must Go

Q. I have been working for my company for over four years. This week the company laid me off with no advance notice and no severance pay.

According to the company personnel policy manual, two weeks' notice is expected from employees before resigning. It also says for layoff matters that any advance notice will be related to the business conditions requiring the layoff. Is it legal for the company to lay me off without giving me two weeks' notice or severance pay?

--D.G., Irvine

A. Assuming that your termination was not part of a mass layoff that would require special notice under the Worker Adjustment, Retraining and Notification Act, there is no statutory requirement that an employer provide an employee who is being laid off with either two weeks' notice or severance pay.

You were correct, however, in reviewing the personnel manual to see whether the company had promised notice or severance pay to employees who are laid off. If the manual had contained a direct promise of severance pay or notice, you might have had an argument that your employer had a contractual obligation to provide you with one or the other. From the language you described in the company manual, however, it seems that the employer has not made any clear promise of severance pay or notice.

Also, while the company "expects" two weeks' notice from resigning employees, the company cannot actually enforce its request that employees give such notice before resigning.

--Josephine Staton Tucker

employment law attorney

Morrison & Foerster

Giving Raises (or Not) Is Up to the Employer

Q. Is it legal for an employer to not give pay raises for years?

--P.C., Fullerton

A. Unless there is a contractual agreement, an employer is not required to increase an employee's rate of pay at any time during employment. Generally, an employer is only obligated to pay minimum wage and to comply with the overtime laws.

There may be several reasons why an employer does not give raises. The employer might feel the employee is not entitled to a raise, might believe the employee is receiving a fair wage, or might be unable to grant a pay raise.

It appears your employer is stingy on giving raises. Therefore, you must show your employer why it has benefited from your continuous service. Prior to asking your employer for a pay raise, you should be prepared to provide examples of your activities. The employer will need more than information that you have come to work on time and have not caused trouble.

--William H. Hackel III

Employment law attorney

Spray, Gould & Bowers

Asking Applicant's Age Not Necessarily Illegal

Q. I have been out of work for the first time in a while. In doing interviews with three companies (all in real estate), I was asked to fill out an application asking for a Social Security number, driver's license number, date of birth and when I graduated from high school. When I chose not to give them the date of birth, they took copies of my driver's license and Social Security card. It was my understanding that this information was given after employment.

I'm over 40 years old and I find this could be discrimination against my age. I didn't get the job at any of these companies.

--L.F., Mission Viejo

A. The information that you say was asked of you is normally sought only after an employment offer is extended. However, it is not necessarily illegal to ask for the information prior to employment, so long as the employment decision is not based on the fact that you are over 40.

The prospective employers may have asked for the information merely to ensure that you are legally entitled to work, or for some other legitimate purpose. On the other hand, it is difficult to fathom why the date of your graduation from high school would be asked.

--Michael A. Hood

employment law attorney

Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker

Married-Couple Ban Muddies Jobless Benefits

Q. My company's policy stipulates that married couples may not work for the company if they are in a supervisory-subordinate relationship. The policy states that the company will try to find another position for one of the workers, but if no positions are available, one of the spouses must quit.

Is the person leaving the company eligible for unemployment? If the company denies the person's unemployment claim, would he/she have a good chance to receive unemployment upon appeal? Does the couple have any other recourse?

--T.P. San Bernardino

A. Technically speaking, this is a voluntary resignation. However, some might argue that it could be interpreted as a discharge. As always in the case of a voluntary departure, the person who quits his or her job must show it was for a "compelling" reason in order to receive unemployment benefits. Quitting to protect the job of one's spouse might be compelling under certain circumstances.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|