Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsStudents

Next L.A.

A New Formula for Teaching Math

Researchers videotape eighth-grade instructors in U.S., Japan and Germany to study why American pupils score lower in international testing.

July 02, 1996|RICHARD LEE COLVIN | TIMES STAFF WRITER

This fall, the Third International Mathematics and Science Study--the largest comparison ever made of student performance, involving 750,000 pupils in 50 countries--will release results that experts expect to show, as earlier studies have, that U.S. pupils lag behind those of most other developed nations.

But this time, U.S. education officials are hoping the study leads to something more productive than collective self-flagellation and casting of blame.

"This is not just another Olympics to determine who is first in math or physics but more to understand what these cross-cultural comparisons are all about," said William H. Schmidt, a Michigan State University professor who is directing the U.S. arm of the study.

As part of that effort, UCLA psychology professor James Stigler has received a $2-million contract from the National Center for Education Statistics to create something that has never been attempted--a video portrait of how eighth-grade math is taught in the United States, Japan and Germany.

Based on hundreds of hours of lessons delivered by randomly selected instructors, the videos capture the work of teachers brilliant and dull alike. The portraits are intended to make it possible to understand differences in the knowledge, behavior and expectations of teachers, which might help explain the variance in student performance in the three countries.

The student data, as well as the analysis of the teachers' lessons, are being kept under tight security. But excitement is building over the potential value of the video portraits for researchers and classroom teachers.

"This study just seems to hold such tremendous promise for actually being able to see what you are talking about when you talk about differences in teaching, differences in questioning techniques, just a wealth of things," said Alice Gill, associate director of education issues for the American Federation of Teachers and an advisor to Stigler's study.

"In the past, we looked at outcomes, at what kids do . . . rather than at what the teaching looks like. This is a very different perspective."

Before being able to do that, however, Stigler and his team had to devise a research tool. They had to develop a way to handle the videotapes that would allow the researchers to treat them as a richly textured, real-life database rather than a series of scenes.

They had to find a way to crunch the videotape just as computer accounting software crunches numbers, to allow them, for example, to quantify how often a teacher assigns a problem or hands out a work sheet of practice equations. More than that, they wanted to be able to call up video of each group problem-solving scene to see how different teachers handled it.

"In the past, if you had hundreds of hours of videotape you were sunk," Stigler said, because the tapes were so unwieldy they were virtually useless.

To solve the problem, Stigler transferred the videotape onto CD-ROMs, in digital form. Then, with the help of a public-private software company created just for this purpose, researchers developed video analysis software that allows users to instantly call up snippets of action based on keyword searches or coding--just as librarians can now search text.

When the portraits are available--perhaps via the Internet--a researcher can see the classroom scene, accompanied by a real-time transcript of what is being said and what is occurring.

So, for example, a researcher could use the software to compare the frequency with which teachers are interrupted by disruptive students in the three countries. Or, they could examine how teachers start lessons or how often they give quizzes.

And the technology could have applications in areas outside education--for market researchers conducting focus groups, for example, or for lawyers using videotaped depositions instead of transcripts.

"It turns out to be a really revolutionary idea and I think it will change the way we look at video," he said. "This allows a new kind of analysis that wasn't possible before."

Gaea Leinhardt, a senior scientist at the Learning Research and Development Center at the University of Pittsburgh, agreed that the software developed by Stigler's team holds great promise.

Now, Leinhardt videotapes highly accomplished teachers for days or weeks at a time, laboriously transcribing and analyzing what they say. She said Stigler's software had never been available and is "exactly the right and neat thing to do."

But, she warned, even videotapes do not provide as much information as actually being in classrooms. The camera excludes what's going on outside its frame. And when researchers try to categorize the multilayered scenes of a classroom in full swing, they may miss or misinterpret subtleties, she said. A teacher seeming to praise a student, for example, may actually be doing so sarcastically. But the interaction might be recorded for analysis purposes as true praise.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|