Advertisement
 

Brave New World

SCIENCE FILE

Last weekend, Scottish researchers announced that they had cloned an adult mammal--Dolly, a 7-month-old ewe. What is cloning? Why did past efforts fail? Can it be done with humans? And what does the success of the procedure portend.?

February 27, 1997|THOMAS H. MAUGH II | TIMES MEDICAL WRITER

Last weekend, Scottish researchers shocked the biological world by announcing that they had successfully cloned an adult mammal. Dr. Ian Wilmut and his colleagues at the Roslin Institute near Edinburgh took DNA from an udder cell of an adult ewe, inserted it into a sheep egg and grew it to birth in a surrogate mother.

They now have a healthy 7-month-old ewe named Dolly that has captured the attention of the world.

Here are answers to some of the most commonly asked questions about this groundbreaking feat and cloning in general.

Q: What is cloning?

A: Cloning is the production of an exact genetic duplicate of a living organism. In normal sexual reproduction, an egg and a sperm--each containing half the normal genetic complement of an adult--fuse, combining their DNA to produce the complete genetic blueprint of a third adult.

In cloning, all of the genetic material comes from one parent, and the offspring is genetically identical to that parent.

Q: Why was Wilmut's success such a surprise?

A: Because virtually all previous attempts at cloning mammals had "failed miserably," according to reproductive scientist Lee Silver of Princeton University. Scientists could readily clone plants, but they made little progress in animals.

The best results previously were in amphibians such as frogs, where researchers could successfully implant adult DNA in eggs and achieve a viable embryo. But the cloned frogs always died in the tadpole stage, never making it to adulthood.

Q: Why did they fail?

A: The problem is that something happens to DNA as the embryo grows to adulthood and individual cells become specialized, turning into skin or brain or kidney cells, for instance.

Each cell contains all the genetic information necessary to make a complete adult organism. But as an embryonic cell slowly turns into a skin cell, for example, those genes that are not needed in a skin cell are shut off. In a human adult skin cell, 85% to 90% of the 100,000 or so genes in the human blueprint are inactivated.

If cloning is to be successful, those inactivated genes must be turned back on. Scientists had tried various methods of doing this but found that large segments of the DNA remained inactivated after it had been inserted into an egg. In effect, the egg was trying to build an adult using only 20% of a blueprint and, of course, it didn't work.

Researchers didn't know how genes were shut off during embryonic development, but they envisioned two mechanisms. During normal cellular activity, unneeded genes are often inactivated by proteins that bind to the DNA double helix structure. That kind of inactivation is reversible.

Alternatively, the DNA could be irreversibly inactivated during growth and maturation by chemically modifying it so that it could no longer be used as a blueprint for the whole organism. If this were the case, cloning would be impossible. The consistent failures at cloning had led researchers to think that DNA was being irreversibly altered.

"That was what we believed until last Saturday," Silver said. "They proved the dogma wrong," added reproductive biologist James Murray of UC Davis.

One of the most important findings in Wilmut's report is that the DNA inactivation is, in fact, apparently reversible, according to biologist Colin Stewart of the National Cancer Institute.

Q: What exactly did Wilmut do to overcome the problem?

A: Through trial and error, he discovered that stopping the growth of adult cells at a particular time allowed genes to become unblocked.

Wilmut's team removed a few cells from the udder of a 6-year-old ewe and began growing them in a laboratory dish. After the cells had been growing for a few days, the team stopped supplying them with crucial nutrients, which halted the cells' growth.

They then took each cell and, using an electric current, fused it with a sheep egg cell from which the DNA had been removed so as not to interfere with the cloning process. (Researchers already knew that it is better to use an unfertilized egg cell than one that had been fertilized.) The electric current also triggers the cloned egg to begin dividing and maturing.

The embryo was then implanted in the uterus of a surrogate mother, where it could grow to term in the same manner as a fertilized egg produced by in vitro fertilization. The team implanted a total of 273 fused eggs and got one lamb.

Wilmut was not following a grand scientific plan in his experiments, but merely varying conditions for the attempted cloning in a systematic manner. "He was just playing games, tinkering with things," Silver said. "Fortunately, he tinkered with the right thing."

Wilmut has performed the same feat using cells taken from early embryos and from late-stage embryos, rather than adult sheep, producing a total of seven sheep clones to date.

Q: Why sheep?

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|