Advertisement

Restore Benefits to Legal Immigrants or Face a Poverty Dead-End

California: Government policies and farm economics are creating a subpopulation of trapped workers and families.

October 15, 1997|MICHAEL FIX and PHILIP MARTIN, Michael Fix is an attorney and analyst at the Urban Institute, an independent research organization based in Washington. Philip Martin is a professor in the Department of Agricultural Resource Economics at UC Davis. Their views here are their own

The long-awaited final report of the U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform released two weeks ago calls for stepped-up efforts to draw immigrants into our cultural mainstream. Five years in the making, the bipartisan report underscores the need to teach immigrant adults and children English and to acquaint newcomers with the nation's civic values.

But one important immigrant subpopulation has needs that go beyond these integration proposals. The roughly 900,000 foreign-born laborers, mainly Mexican, who work sometime during the year in California agriculture live in a world apart from most Americans and even from the kind of familiar rural poverty captured in lingering images of the Dust Bowl or postwar Appalachia.


Advertisement

This new immigrant population is rapidly changing the face of California's--and the nation's--agricultural regions. Mexican and other Latin American migrants who used to commute seasonally between the U.S. and their homelands are now settling in rural California, in some cases to avoid the higher risks of coming back across a tightened border. These new settlement patterns have concentrated poverty in selected communities within an increasingly prosperous farm economy.

In 1990, seven of the 10 U.S. cities with the highest share of immigrants living in pockets of intense poverty were in California's San Joaquin Valley, where export-driven agriculture sales exceeded those of any other state. Unlike the rural poverty of the postwar South or the Midwest of the 1930s and '40s, today's rural poverty grows along with today's prosperity.

The hallmarks of this new rural poverty are low wages, poor working conditions and a permanent labor surplus.

We have been studying the situation in seven California towns: Parlier, Madera, Farmersville, McFarland, Shandon, Guadalupe and Watsonville. In most of them, the population grew rapidly in the 1970s and '80s, wages and incomes stagnated and the use of public assistance remained stubbornly high through the mid-'90s.

Behind the persistent poverty and insecurity that these conditions inevitably breed is a deep structural economic problem: a disconnect between a flourishing agricultural industry and the overburdened towns and cities that provide the services needed by growing migrant populations. These communities are ill-equipped to assimilate sudden waves of newcomers, since their tax bases are limited and since the working poor have little to spend and initially pay little in taxes.

Los Angeles Times Articles
|