Advertisement

With Royals, Much Divined From Little

Journalism: British press employs art and science, sometimes bit of a snow job.

September 05, 1997|PATT MORRISON, TIMES STAFF WRITER

LONDON — Virtually every day since the reign of Mad King George III, and even during this incredible week, the Court Circular, the royal and tersely official printed equivalent of the White House daily press briefing, has reported the doings of the British royal family--after a fashion.

For last Sunday, it noted simply that the prince of Wales "learned this morning with great sadness of the death of Diana, princess of Wales. Divine service was later held in Crathie Parish Church."


Advertisement

Yet, in the Daily Mail newspaper, the same Prince Charles is described in minute detail as walking sleeplessly through the heather at dawn, drinking gin martinis until all hours, tears coursing "down his ever-suntanned cheeks."

How do they do that?

How does Britain's press, tabloid and broadsheet, fill newspapers with stories about men and women who don't give press conferences, hardly ever grant interviews--in fact, scarcely acknowledge the Fourth Estate at all?

And how, especially, on this of all stories, when the words that Britain's royal family has issued on the death of Diana wouldn't fill a Hallmark card?

Covering the royal beat is art and science, fiction and science fiction, shoe leather and a bit of snow job. It is Kremlinology--who stands where on the balcony. It is reading tea leaves and divining the future from the entrails of a sheep. And sometimes it is a tabloid cash transaction, a few pound notes in exchange for a few nuggets of information.

Come Saturday, the nation and the world will see seated in Westminster Abbey the largest turnout of royals in years--an appearance executed, as usual, in mime. And as always, the news stories will microtome every nuance of their mute conduct, looking for The Story.

Rhod Sharpe, who hosts a BBC radio program, knows the drill from when he covered the royals for a Scottish newspaper:

"Observe the body language. How still are the queen and [her husband, Prince Philip] standing? If Charles brings a finger up anywhere near the tip of his nose, it'll be, 'He's wiping away a tear.' "

The clamor has been for the royals not only to grieve but also to be seen to grieve. It's a quandary: If they don't weep, they're coldhearted, and if they do join in the national crying jag, they'll be accused of shedding crocodile tears.

"They cannot win," believes Judy Wade, royal correspondent for Hello!, a weekly magazine. "The slightest thing will be interpreted," and the watching press will, she said, to enlist a Fleet Street cliche, "get out the old eggbeater and whip up the story."

Los Angeles Times Articles
|