Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Making It

Documentary Maker Follows His Own Path in Celebrating History

Filmmaker Ken Burns' obsession with the past has led him on a quest to unearth, examine and visually 'sing' the American experience.

November 12, 2000|SUSAN VAUGHN | SPECIAL TO THE TIMES

In the early 1970s, a Hampshire College student named Ken Burns decided against a Hollywood film career. He wanted to be a time traveler, visiting yesteryear America, meeting its legendary heroes and celebrating his discoveries in documentaries.

"I'm asking 'Who are we?' Who am I?' " Burns said. "It's an obvious question for any artist. For me, it's intensely personal and psychological."

There was a second reason for Burns' decision: control of his productions, something Hollywood wouldn't permit. "I'm in the enviable position of telling you that if my films are bad, it's entirely my fault," he said.

Burns chose this route, though it could have meant a future of poverty and anonymity. But something unexpected happened along the way: America fell in love with Burns' artistic recountings of history.

Burns, who'd taken his last formal American history class in 11th grade, turned such subjects as the Brooklyn Bridge, the Statue of Liberty and the Shakers into cinematic opera through his masterful reworking of the documentary form.

However, it wasn't until the 1990 airing of his 11-hour PBS series, "The Civil War"--the most-watched show on public television, and the first documentary to gross more than $100 million--that his destiny changed.

Burns, 47, was far from an overnight success. After graduating, he took any cinematography work offered him. He struggled for day wages, while shooting for the BBC and Italian television. And though his first documentaries were roundly praised, they brought him little income.

Undeterred, he kept plugging. In the mid-1980s, he selected the Civil War as the subject of his next documentary subject.

"People had told him not to do it ["The Civil War"], that it was foolish," said Gary Edgerton, a professor at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Va., who's writing an analysis of Burns' works for St. Martin's Press tentatively titled "Ken Burns' America." "They said it was far too monumental a subject for one person to handle."

"Word was, he was eating peanut butter and jelly sandwiches and sleeping on the floor," said Rozanne Weissman, who was with Corp. for Public Broadcasting when Burns approached the organization for funding. Its committee members turned him down, Weissman said.

"They were saying, 'Who is ever going to watch a series that is so long about the Civil War, where you're only showing still photos and panning a camera?' "

Burns persisted, with an almost evangelistic resolve. He continued searching for funds, working 15-hour days, and, though money was scarce, turning down offers to direct commercials that might have earned him up to $10,000 per day.

He took 5 1/2 years to finish "The Civil War," a time span longer than the war itself. He sifted through 16,000 old photographs, shot 150 hours of film, edited the material down to 11 hours, and added period music and off-camera narration.

Burns abhors dramatic reenactments. He said they didn't do the dead justice. Instead, he used cinematography to convey action and emotion. He'd film a now-peaceful battlefield site at the precise time of day when a skirmish occurred, pan the acreage, zoom in for close-ups, and let his camera gallop and lurch over terrain. He'd then cut to photographic stills of the bloody aftermath. This way, he let the dead tell their own tales.

"Various filmmakers had used these techniques before, but he put them together in a form distinctly his own," Edgerton said.

*

Burns learned much of his documentary methodology at Hampshire College in Amherst, Mass., under the tutelage of two teachers, renowned photographer Jerome Liebling and Elaine Mayes. Liebling, whose jarringly beautiful black-and-white photographs express social realism themes, taught Burns and his peers to subtly allow their subjects to state their own meaning and eloquence. Mayes amplified this skill.

"I taught how to see, how to pay attention to things in the world, how to look with a camera," Mayes said. "He was encouraged by us to be inventive, not to work from a pre-planned script but to [innovate] as he went along."

Burns was an apt pupil. His approach to documentaries can only be described as "organic." He visits his subjects as a wide-eyed initiate, believing that his lack of prior knowledge is an asset; he'll learn along with his audiences. Bucking documentary traditions, he first selects musical pieces before scripting and shooting the projects.

"I might take 50 different tunes I liked, go into the studio and play each tune 20 or 30 different ways, until I found what I wanted," he said. "Then I'd begin writing and editing to the music, conforming scenes to the music's emotional power."

As he proceeds, he lets his scripts and narratives evolve with his discoveries.

"We ask questions without any idea where we're going in the script," Burns said, conceding that his approach is more time-consuming and expensive than the more traditionally prescriptive method of documentary-making. "At the darkest moments of editing, we have to trust."

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|