Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

VENTURA COUNTY NEWS

Builder Says Housing Project Won't Harm Rare Species

Environment: Opponents' request denied for new study of Ahmanson Ranch development, which shares land with threatened frog, flower.

October 14, 2000|ANNETTE KONDO | TIMES STAFF WRITER

The massive Ahmanson Ranch housing project can be built on the habitat of rare species without harming a threatened frog or a flower once believed extinct, according to developer Washington Mutual Inc.

The firm recently made the assertion in a draft conservation plan filed with Ventura County in a bid to avoid delays in the 3,050-home project.

The development, on the east Ventura County line, has become the focus of controversy. Ventura County has approved the plans, while Los Angeles County has challenged the project because of the impact on traffic and other public services.

Five of the 16 key habitat areas of the spineflower would be destroyed under the plan, according to Washington Mutual.

The draft plan is preliminary and is subject to review and approvals by Ventura County supervisors, the state Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Earlier this week, Ventura County officials rejected requests for a new environmental study, and instead approved Washington Mutual's request to prepare a supplemental environmental review to update a 1992 report. That action was prompted in part by last year's discovery of the two species on Ahmanson Ranch land. The follow-up study will also examine the conservation measures for the spineflower and red-legged frog.

Opponents, such as Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Sherman Oaks) and the city of Calabasas, contended Friday the draft fails to protect the endangered species.

Sherman, a vocal opponent of the project, had unsuccessfully lobbied state and federal agencies for an independent scientific panel to help develop a preservation plan for the frog and flower. Sherman was also unable to convince Ventura County to pursue a new environmental study instead of the less comprehensive supplemental report.

"We are disappointed that Ahmanson has decided not to be more forthcoming with information regarding the project," said Susan Little, Sherman's environmental deputy. "We are very concerned that the public hasn't had more access to the decision-making process, especially given the fact that the project will have such a tremendous regional impact."

The draft proposal recently filed with the Ventura County Planning Department outlines several potential measures, including:

* Adjusting the roads on Laskey Mesa, where many of the spineflowers are located, and realigning roads that affect East Las Virgenes Creek, where the frog has been found.

* Adjusting grading of project land near spineflower locations.

* Designing storm water drainage and water flows that won't adversely affect spineflower and frog preserve areas.

* Monitoring of water supply to frog areas and installation of a water supply line in the event frog pool water levels decline significantly.

* Monitoring of water quality in frog areas, including runoff from golf course basins.

* Installing fencing or other barriers to protect flower and frog preserve areas.

* Developing management and habitat monitoring plans for the frog and spineflower.

* Appointing an on-site monitor who will oversee construction on days when building occurs within 200 feet of spineflower preserve zones and within 300 feet of core frog areas.

* Additional spineflower reintroduction on non-Ahmanson Ranch land and a continued research of the species.

* Creation of breeding pools within East Las Virgenes Creek and the golf course.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|