YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections


On His Own Terms

Filmmaker Brad Anderson sticks to an off-the-beaten-track approach in his latest, 'Happy Accidents,' a romance with a bizarre twist.


T\o7 he only thing predictable about independent filmmaker Brad Anderson is his unpredictability. For his first big indie hit, 1998's "Next Stop Wonderland," he presented a twist to the romantic comedy genre by keeping audiences in the dark about whether the film's two protagonists would ever meet, let alone fall in love.

The 36-year-old Anderson offered a fresh take on horror films with his recent "Session 9," a deliberately ambiguous psychological thriller set in an abandoned mental hospital. And in his newest film, "Happy Accidents," he offers yet another unique spin on a romantic comedy.

Oscar-winner Ma-risa Tomei and Vincent D'Onofrio star in "Happy Accidents," opening in limited release Sept. 14, about a single young New Yorker, Ruby, who, after finding several Mr. Wrongs, believes she has found Mr. Right in the form of the sweet Sam Deed, a newcomer from Dubuque, Iowa. The two fall quickly in love, but then their relationship takes a bizarre turn when Sam tells Ruby he's actually a time traveler from the year 2470.

Turning to her therapist (Holland Taylor, Anderson's aunt) and her best friend (Nadia Dajani) for help, Ruby must decide if she and Sam have a future together or if he is a basket case with an overripe imagination.

Anderson studied ethnographic film at Bowdoin College and film production in London. After moving to Boston in the early '90s, he made his first film, 1995's "The Darien Gap," a humorous take on Generation X, which was screened at Sundance in 1996 and at several other festivals. "Next Stop Wonderland" won the Grand Prix and Audience Award at the Deauville Film Festival in France and an Excellence in Filmmaking Award from the National Board of Review.

The lanky director, who lives in New York City, was in town recently to talk about "Happy Accidents" and his offbeat approach to filmmaking.\f7

Question: Did you get a lot of offers from Hollywood after the critical acclaim and art house success of "Next Stop Wonderland"?

Answer: I did. I set out to do something with Miramax, and frankly I'm glad [it didn't happen] because I didn't want to get on this course where I was going to be doing just big, goofy romantic comedies with the latest cast of "Dawson's Creek." I was getting a lot of scripts that were about a lonely girl living in Manhattan.

One of the reasons I did "Happy Accidents" was to do [a comedy] in my own way. I wouldn't be able to get that done at a studio, it's too weird. Similarly, with "Session 9," I wanted to do a horror movie on my terms. If I had done that with a studio, first of all you would have to make everyone 18 to 25 and you would have to have a monster of some sort, a physical CG [computer-generated] monster. I think I have done these movies because I have had the ability to do it my way.

Q: How did you come up with the idea that the protagonist was a time traveler?

A: The initial premise was what would be the most absurd thing that in the course of a relationship between two people would throw the whole relationship into a tailspin or freak it out and how that relationship would proceed from that time.

I don't remember exactly how the time travel element entered into it. But once I had that revelation, it became the seed for the story. In "Next Stop Wonderland," it was sort of about a lonely, intelligent woman looking for the right guy. But I wanted to do a movie about a woman who was really seriously flawed in a sense that she means well and she wants to meet someone who works but she is continuously drawn to men who have big problems. She can't seem to get out of that rut.

Of course, I thought it would be funny if she meets a guy who is somewhat normal and sweet and charming, and all of a sudden he drops the biggest revelation of all. He is a total nut case, and how is she going to deal with that fact? Instead of tossing him out immediately, she somehow finds herself incapable of getting rid of him.

Q: Was it difficult to get financing for "Happy Accidents" because it is so unusual?

A: I was lucky. I was in touch with IFC Films. They financed the movie. I met with [executive producer] Jonathan Sehring, who liked my other films. I told him about the project, and they said show [the script] to us when you are done. It was like within a week [when] they said, "Let's make it." They just go with the courage of their convictions. We didn't have anyone attached at that point. But then Marisa got on board very quickly, and then I got Vince.

Q: Because "Happy Accidents" is a romantic comedy with serious overtones and has a sci-fi theme running throughout, was it difficult to find the right tone?

Los Angeles Times Articles