YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

World's Most Wanted Proving Elusive for U.S.

Failure to capture Bin Laden, Omar adds to their stature. Hussein may pose similar risk.

November 14, 2002|Alissa J. Rubin and Maura Reynolds | Times Staff Writers

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan — On a cold winter night nearly a year ago, the spiritual leader of the Taliban took one of two open roads leading out of this city, his movement's last stronghold, and vanished into the desolate mountains of central Afghanistan.

There were U.S. warplanes in the air, a Marine base nearby and Afghan allies on the ground. But Mullah Mohammed Omar had an advantage: He knew the moonscape terrain from childhood.

Meanwhile, about 300 miles to the northeast, U.S. forces searching for Osama bin Laden along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border heard the last confirmed transmission from him. In the months since then, a series of massive military operations by U.S. forces has found no trace of either man. And each unsuccessful foray has increased the fugitives' stature with their followers.

The disappearance of the two most wanted men in Afghanistan is a potent reminder of the difficulty of hunting down enemy leaders. The apparent reemergence of Bin Laden in a taped message this week looms large as the United States prepares to go after one more "most wanted" figure: Iraqi President Saddam Hussein.

U.S. experts have concluded that the voice on the tape urging new attacks on the United States and praising recent acts of terrorism elsewhere in the world is almost certainly that of Bin Laden.

Some experts say the United States errs when it focuses on individuals, who are vastly more elusive than the bridges, airfields and other fixed assets of a regime.

Such figures can serve as a rallying point for protests, or an inspiration for further terrorist attacks. Every mission to capture them runs the risk of causing civilian casualties, which increase resentment of U.S. power.

"We put ourselves into a trap by demonizing these people and insisting on total victory, and we often don't have the strategic means to get them," said Donald Abenheim, an expert in military strategy and history at Stanford University's Hoover Institution. "It makes the individual the center of gravity, and we feed [a desire] to create an uprising against the West -- and that remains the greatest threat to security."

The pattern was apparent shortly after the Sept. 11 terror attacks, when President Bush declared he wanted Bin Laden "dead or alive."

Such pronouncements fit into a long history that includes Gen. John Pershing's futile pursuit of Pancho Villa in the rugged mountains of northern Mexico, a missile attack on Libyan dictator Moammar Kadafi in the 1980s and the capture of Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega in 1990.

In Bosnia-Herzegovina, U.S. and other international forces periodically raid villages, looking for war crimes suspect Radovan Karadzic. The former Bosnian Serb leader, like Omar, is thought to be hiding in the mountains that were his childhood home.

In Afghanistan, Omar's knowledge of the landscape clearly helped him escape during a chaotic 24-hour period between Dec. 6 and 7, when the Taliban agreed to surrender Kandahar, its last stronghold.

Four roads lead out of Kandahar, only two of which were blocked by Afghan forces allied with the United States. On the city's outskirts, signs of habitation vanish quickly into a landscape of flat plains and barren hillsides that is at once deceptively simple and an utter mystery.

Either of the two roads open to Omar that night led into friendly terrain -- areas he knew well enough to avoid confrontations with forces loyal to Hamid Karzai, who was fighting there at the time and has since become Afghanistan's president.

One route traversed Zabol province, home to semi-nomadic herders, many of whom had backed the Taliban. The other led to Helmand province. Many Taliban leaders, including Omar, had homes and allies in Helmand and adjacent valleys in Oruzgan province.

Afghan officials acknowledge that the two factions friendly to the Americans closing in on Kandahar that night were unaware of each other's activities. Neither one moved to block the roads.

"This was not very good coordination between the two Afghan groups," recalled Engineer Yusuf Pashtun, a top aide to local warlord Gul Agha Shirzai.

Deeper into the desert plains, anti-Taliban warlords lacked telephones or other means of communication and were barely even in touch with forces allied with the U.S. They learned of Omar's impending surrender from radio broadcasts.

Lack of Weapons

Along the road to Helmand, commander Malim Khad Mazer in the village of Gereshk mustered all the men he could. He says there were about 1,000 of them, but only about 150 had weapons. They seized the police station and stopped there. For the rest of the night they lay low.

"If we had been armed and had food and money and satellite phones, then we could have arrested each and every Taliban, including their leaders," Mazer said.

Los Angeles Times Articles