WASHINGTON — A divided Senate on Tuesday approved 55 to 44 President Bush's long-delayed appellate court nomination of U.S. District Judge Dennis W. Shedd, a protege of retiring Sen. Strom Thurmond (R-S.C.).
Shedd's appointment was bitterly opposed by civil rights and women's groups, who accused the 49-year-old South Carolina judge of siding mainly with employers in discrimination suits.
But Shedd's supporters accused the judge's critics of ignoring the message from the election earlier this month that will give Republicans control of both houses of Congress in January.
"The election showed that Americans trust this president, including in his selection of judicial nominees," said Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah), who will become chairman of the Judiciary Committee when the 108th Congress convenes.
In support of Shedd's nomination, Thurmond -- who turns 100 on Dec. 5 and came to the Senate in 1954 -- delivered his last speech on the Senate floor, saying that the judge would "uphold the rights of all people." He received a standing ovation.
While campaigning for GOP candidates this fall, Bush assailed the Democratic-led Senate for blocking qualified judicial nominees for political reasons, creating what he called a vacancy crisis on the federal bench. Democrats, in turn, have accused Bush of attempting to pack the bench with conservative ideologues.
Of 862 federal judgeships, 60 are vacant, according to the Justice Department. Shedd was among several of Bush's judicial choices who have been waiting for a Senate vote since they were nominated on May 9, 2001. However, that is still less than the nearly four years that Judge Richard A. Paez of Los Angeles, a nominee of President Clinton to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, waited before he won confirmation two years ago.
Democrats say they have confirmed 100 judicial nominees since taking over the Senate. But Republicans say Bush's choices have encountered more resistance than those in previous administrations.
Analysts said Shedd, a former aide to Thurmond and a former chief counsel to the Judiciary Committee, won approval because Democrats are picking their battles more carefully.
"This would not appear to be the appointment with which to draw some line in the sand and make a fight," said Elliot Slotnick, a political science professor at Ohio State University. "Those fights might come -- certainly over some prospective Supreme Court nominees should a vacancy arise."
