Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsOpinion

The Wrong Resolution

October 11, 2002

The resolution Congress passed early today authorizing the use of military force against Iraq gives too much power to this and, potentially, future presidents to attack nations unilaterally based on mere suspicions.

This could fundamentally change the nation's approach to foreign policy. It could also, as Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) observed this week, "have ramifications for the future of the world, because other countries will adopt this same philosophy." A preemptive strike against Iraq could spring open a Pandora's box of aggression. Russia could cite it to crush insurgents in Georgia. India could use it to justify a nuclear strike to prevent Pakistan from such an attack.


Advertisement

When John Quincy Adams declared that America "goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy," he articulated a doctrine that has served the nation well. In two world wars and the Cold War, the United States could pride itself on acting defensively. America did not seek out evil; evil sought out America.

History has also shown the risks of straying from this policy of restraint. Because Congress passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution in 1964, giving President Lyndon B. Johnson the power to send more troops to Vietnam, many thousands of young Americans died in a war the nation ultimately lost. In that case, legislators could legitimately say the White House had misled them. Today Congress has no such excuse.

Though shorn of the original resolution's more sweeping language, the measure approved by Congress is clear. It expands presidents' powers and undercuts Adams' doctrine of defense. On Thursday, Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) warned: "We have said historically we are a defensive nation. This new foreign policy ... is a dramatic departure from that.... I beg and caution my colleagues to think twice about that."

It is to the nation's credit that the quality of debate in Congress matched the gravity of the occasion. The public's reasoned unease about heading into war seems to have prompted President Bush's turn toward caution and new emphasis on the role of the United Nations and an international coalition.

Now that the resolution has passed, Congress and the American people should urge the president to interpret his mandate narrowly.

The resolution requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of any military action against Iraq and to submit at least every 80 days a report to Congress about any campaign.

Los Angeles Times Articles
|