YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections


Limits Sought for Government Spying

February 19, 2003|From Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Civil liberties groups are using a long-shot approach in an effort to get the Supreme Court to limit the government's power to spy, filing an appeal Tuesday on behalf of people who don't even know they're being monitored.

The American Civil Liberties Union and other organizations hope to draw the justices into their first post-Sept. 11 anti-terrorism case with a challenge of the Justice Department's surveillance powers.

Congress gave the government broader spying authority after the 2001 terrorist attacks. The ACLU argued that a review court misinterpreted the law, making it too easy for the government to get permission to listen to phone conversations, read e-mail and search private property, and then use the information in criminal cases.

The ACLU and other critics worry there are not enough checks to ensure the government's snooping doesn't stretch to law-abiding citizens.

The Supreme Court may not allow the appeal because the ACLU was not one of the parties in the review court case. The ACLU filed arguments opposing the government but was not directly involved.

The ACLU, joined by American Arab groups, say they represent people who are being monitored under warrants approved by the super-secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, or "spy court." It deals with intelligence requests involving suspected spies, terrorists or foreign agents.

"The irony is no one can know for certain whether they are the subject of these secret surveillance orders because they're secret," said Ann Beeson, ACLU's associate legal director.

She said the group has "taken this somewhat radical step" to protect those people.

Scott Silliman, director of Duke University's Center on Law, Ethics and National Security, said the Supreme Court would have to make an extraordinary exception for the ACLU.

"I see no way that they could possibly create an appeal without any standing. Clearly it will be dismissed," he said.

The November ruling by the review court was a huge victory for the Bush administration, which argues that the surveillance is an important component of its war on terrorism.

Los Angeles Times Articles