Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

THE NATION

Sally Ride Hears Echoes in Columbia Disaster

The former astronaut, who is marking the 20th anniversary of her initial flight, has served on both shuttle accident investigation panels.

June 15, 2003|Marcia Dunn | Associated Press Writer

HOUSTON — Twenty years after becoming America's first woman in space, Sally Ride finds herself investigating yet another shuttle disaster -- a discouraging way to mark the anniversary of her history-making flight.

The former astronaut is the only person to take part in both the Challenger and Columbia accident inquiries, and she has seen all the space shuttle program's warts up close. But she is hopeful that whatever is broken within NASA can be fixed and that the shrunken fleet will -- and should -- fly again.

And even knowing all that she knows from the investigation -- about decision-making errors and flawed inspections -- she said she'd fly the shuttle again if she were still in the astronaut corps.

"It's got a lot of good years left in it, but attention has to be paid to aging," Ride said after another long day of Columbia investigative work. Historically, NASA isn't used to operating old spacecraft, but in a time of tighter budgets, she believes that the agency needs to do a better job.

Before flying home to San Diego, Ride noted that it's depressing to spend the 20th anniversary of her flight deciphering the Feb. 1 events that led to Columbia's destruction and the deaths of seven astronauts.

"But in another sense, it's rewarding because it's an opportunity to be part of the solution and part of the changes that will occur and will make the program better," she said.

Ride rocketed into orbit and into headlines on June 18, 1983, on Challenger. It was two decades after the Soviets had sent a woman into space, but Ride, a physicist, was the first American woman to go up. She beat out five female colleagues. She returned to space a year later, again aboard Challenger, and was training for her third and final mission when the shuttle erupted in a fireball barely a minute into liftoff on Jan. 28, 1986.

Columbia was ending a mission when it shattered above Texas 17 years and 4 days later.

Ride sees definite parallels between NASA's two shuttle catastrophes -- "echoes," as she calls them. Both flights, for instance, fell victim to miscommunication. For Challenger, it involved teleconferences and O-rings; for Columbia, e-mails and insulating foam.

"But these are two very, very different accidents at very different times and the organization is quite different," Ride said. "The echoes are there, but I don't think that's the overriding message of our investigation at all."

She says it's possible that over the years, "a little less, little lower level of concern had crept in" for landings, versus launches.

"Everyone knows that launches are risky. Re-entries haven't seen that many problems. There's not rocket fuel exploding underneath the astronauts," she said. "It's an airplane, albeit a very unusual sort of amazing airplane. ... It lands on a runway. That's a little more familiar feel to it."

Since Ride's first ride, 37 women have flown on space shuttles, about 13% of the total number of shuttle travelers.

At present, women make up 21% of NASA's astronaut corps.

And women make up 28% of the shuttle casualty list.

Two women died aboard Challenger: Christa McAuliffe, a teacher, and Judith Resnik, who had become the second American woman in space 1 1/2 years earlier.

Two women also died aboard Columbia: Kalpana Chawla and Laurel Clark.

Both crews were diverse, not just in sex but in race and religion. Ride pointed out that the lead flight director for Columbia's last mission was a woman. So was the head of the mission management team, who rejected engineers' requests during the flight that Columbia be photographed by spy satellites for wing damage. The engineers were worried about the chunk of insulating foam that broke off the fuel tank during the mid-January launch and smashed into the wing.

Despite poor decision-making and other factors that contributed to both accidents, Ride, 52, says she would jump at the chance to rocket into orbit again -- if only she could skip all the months and years of training.

She's too busy with other things. Besides serving on the investigation board, she is a physics professor at UC San Diego and runs the Sally Ride Science Club for girls through her company, Imaginary Lines Inc. The company's goal is to encourage elementary- and middle-school girls in science, math, engineering and technology.

Ride insists that she would not be any more afraid to fly after what happened to Columbia. She recalls being nervous for her first launch and also surprised when "this unbelievable feeling of helplessness, like there was nothing I could do," washed over her at the moment of liftoff.

Before Challenger and certainly before Columbia, "there was a real, pretty good understanding that things could go wrong."

"It's important to realize that rockets are rockets, and rockets are still risky technology, and that's true of every type of rocket that we or any other country have ever built," she said. "Rockets don't work 100% of the time. They just don't."

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|