YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections


Salton Sea Plan Mired in Muck

An unstable layer of thick silt threatens a proposal to build a dike designed to stave off ecological disaster.

November 24, 2003|Louis Sahagun | Times Staff Writer

SALTON SEA — Scientists have uncovered a distressing secret about the lakebed of the Salton Sea: Portions of it are covered with a 50-foot-thick layer of silt the consistency of peanut butter.

That revelation is particularly troubling for California's largest lake, a place of promise and despair that has endured three decades of scientific study and political haggling.

The latest findings place in jeopardy a proposal by state and federal agencies to build an 8 1/2-mile dike across the desolate and smelly lake to stave off ecological disaster. Salton Sea Authority officials say the costs of that plan could double, to $3 billion.

"It's a very disturbing piece of information," said Imperial County Supervisor Gary Wyatt. "Given the current political climate and budget restraints facing California, it could be hard coming up with that kind of money for the Salton Sea."

Equally worrisome is a series of mysterious biological anomalies not seen since 1989, which could have dire consequences for the 360-square-mile agricultural sump touted by Salton Sea Authority officials as a multimillion-dollar fishery and "crown jewel of California avian biodiversity."

Perch-like fish called tilapia have failed to regenerate in anticipated numbers after a massive die-off three years ago. With fewer fish to feed on, there are fewer migrating birds. And swarms of insects called boatmen are taking wing and descending on homes and vehicles for miles around.

The Salton Sea first appeared in prehistoric times when the Colorado River repeatedly formed large lakes by filling a natural depression in the area. The most recent version was created in 1905, when the river broke through a silt-laden canal and roared unimpeded for two years into the basin near Brawley known as the Salton Sink.

Its salinity enabled oceangoing fish such as croaker, corvina, sargo and tilapia to thrive and make the area a haven for tens of thousands of birds and waterfowl.

The Salton Sea and surrounding valleys provide habitat for more than 400 species of birds -- half the entire number of species to be found nationwide. One of the most important wetlands along the Pacific Flyway, the Salton Sea supports 40% of the nation's threatened Yuma clapper rails, nearly 90% of its American white pelicans and 90% of its eared grebes.

On a recent weekday, however, bird populations were lower than usual for this time of year, and there were only a handful of fishermen trying their luck at the 35-mile-long lake straddling Riverside and Imperial counties about 150 miles south of Los Angeles.

The challenges at the Salton Sea recently were compounded by an agreement to move more water from Imperial Valley to San Diego.

Under that accord, inflows to the sea would be reduced, raising concerns about dust clouds if it were to recede.

Officials had some good news to report this week, but they're struggling to explain it. Essentially, the salinity has somehow remained stable -- just below the point that would be fatal for fish eggs and larvae -- even though the water level has dropped nearly a foot over the last year and inflows from local farms have dumped an estimated 5 million tons of salt.

"Our best scientists are baffled by this," said Salton Sea scientist Doug Barnum. "The Salton Sea has some things going on that just don't happen in other hyper-saline environments."

Backers of the Salton Sea had viewed the proposed earthen dike as part of a relatively cost-efficient $1.5-billion plan to create a healthier, environmentally balanced smaller lake for birds and fish.

Under the so-called "Salton Lake concept," a significant amount of farm runoff would be diverted to a desalination plant. The treated water would then be shipped to farms for irrigation in the Imperial and Coachella valleys.

Clean water left over from the desalinization process would be released into the lake on the north side of the dike, reducing the salinity of the water. The south side would be reserved for shallow-water habitat, geothermal energy plants and salt ponds.

The reclaimed runoff would go to irrigation districts, enabling them to share more water with urban customers on the coast.

A preliminary analysis of the core samples, however, showed that the seismically active and gooey seabed may not be stable enough to support a dike.

"If it is as soft down there as the core samples suggest, the idea of building an earthen dike may not be as feasible as we had hoped," said Mike Walker, Salton Sea program manager for the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.

"I'm not ready to throw in the towel," Walker added. "But we now have to talk about building a dam instead of a dike, and that means cost estimates will have to go up."

Tom Kirk, executive director of the Salton Sea Authority and a leading proponent of protecting the lake as a national asset, agreed.

"Building a standard dike structure would be next to impossible," he said. "But if the cost goes up to $3 billion, I'm not sure there will be a political will to do it."

Los Angeles Times Articles