YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections


How Top Contenders Weigh In on Key Issues

Bustamante, McClintock and Schwarzenegger contrast sharply on economic concerns.

October 06, 2003|Marla Dickerson | Times Staff Writer

The main challengers in Tuesday's recall election offer voters a sharp contrast in philosophies about how to plug California's deep budget hole and jump-start its sluggish economy.

Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante, the only Democratic officeholder running to replace Gov. Gray Davis, favors higher taxes as well as additional program cuts to shrink the state's projected $8-billion budget deficit. He wants to regulate the state's electricity market to bring down rates for businesses, and he supports a stronger safety net for the state's workers.

The platforms of Republicans state Sen. Tom McClintock (R-Thousand Oaks) and Arnold Schwarzenegger are staunchly anti-tax.

Both have called for reduced government spending as the main solution to balancing the state's books. They want to lighten Sacramento's mandates on businesses to spark economic development, and they oppose pending legislation that would put additional cost burdens on industry.

Economists say it's a classic battle that pits bigger government versus smaller government, regulation versus laissez faire, public investment versus private sector, labor versus employers.

The outcome of the election "is going to have a tremendous impact on the business climate," said Jack Kyser, chief economist with the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corp. "I think right now you have lot of businesses just sort of holding on waiting to see what happens."

The economy has been a central theme of the recall election. Employers are seething over rising business costs, including workers' compensation, and are furious at new health-care and living-wage legislation that could drive their expenses even higher.

The Republican front-runners have seized on the discontent, warning of an exodus of jobs and businesses that could sink the recovery and damage the state's long-term prospects.

Bustamante and incumbent Davis have countered that California's economy has performed no worse than the nation as a whole.

Both the state and the nation, in fact, have lost about 2% of their nonfarm payroll jobs since the downturn began in March 2001.

It's no secret many business groups support the anti-tax, smaller government, lower-regulation stance of the leading Republican challengers. But whether a party change in the governor's mansion can have a real effect remains to be seen. With the California Legislature solidly Democratic, a changeover could be a recipe for gridlock.

Whatever voters decide Tuesday, "the symbolism is going to be huge," said Mark Schniepp, director of the California Economic Forecast Project in Santa Barbara. "I think the psychological impact could be bigger than anything else."

What follows are the candidates' positions on some key economic issues, as gleaned from their public statements, Web sites and written responses to questions posed to them by The Times:



Bustamante proposes boosting the cigarette tax by $1.50 a pack and alcohol taxes by 25 cents per gallon. He would raise personal income taxes above the 9.3% ceiling by reinstating brackets of 10% and 11% for top wage earners. He also wants to raise commercial property taxes by allowing regular reassessments of business properties to keep pace with rising values. Such a change would require a constitutional amendment to Proposition 13. At the same time, Cruz wants a partial rollback of the vehicle licensing fee hike by exempting cars that sell for less than $20,000 from the increase.

McClintock has steadfastly opposed any tax increases, or new taxes of any type. The state senator supports balancing the budget solely through program cuts. He favors a rollback of the recent tripling of the vehicle licensing fee.

Schwarzenegger espouses an anti-tax philosophy, but he has stopped short of promising no tax increases. He wants to repeal the recent car tax increase and stop pending hikes in unemployment insurance taxes on businesses. He has affirmed his support for Proposition 13, which caps property taxes in California.



Bustamante has declared the state's deregulation plan a failure that has resulted in higher electricity rates for many California businesses. He proposes regulating the electricity market "to restore safety, reliability and predictability to energy pricing," although he hasn't specified what the new rules would look like.

McClintock is committed to privatization and blames the skyrocketing electricity prices that accompanied deregulation on government meddling that interfered with the working of market forces. He wants to void more than $40 billion in long-term energy contracts signed by the Davis administration, which he describes as "massively overpriced." He plans to encourage the construction of new hydroelectric and nuclear power facilities to provide more sources of power.

Los Angeles Times Articles