Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Judge Backs Same-Sex Marriage

A Washington state law that bars gay unions is unconstitutional, a lower court rules.

August 05, 2004|Lynn Marshall and Elizabeth Mehren | Times Staff Writers

SEATTLE — Gay and lesbian couples can marry under Washington state law because denying them that right is unconstitutional, a judge ruled Wednesday.

Prohibiting same-sex couples from marrying is "not rationally related to any legitimate or compelling state interest," said King County Superior Court Judge William L. Downing, who issued his ruling in response to a challenge of a state law defining marriage as between a man and a woman.

Downing stayed his decision to allow the state's Supreme Court to review the case. Until that court rules, no marriage licenses can be issued to same-sex couples in Washington.

If Downing's decision is upheld, Washington will become the second state -- after Massachusetts -- to permit gay and lesbian couples to marry. If sustained, the ruling would go beyond the law in Massachusetts because Washington has no residency requirements and would allow out-of-state couples to wed.

For The Record
Los Angeles Times Friday August 06, 2004 Home Edition Main News Part A Page 2 National Desk 1 inches; 48 words Type of Material: Correction
Same-sex marriage -- An article in Thursday's Section A said the American Civil Liberties Union and LAMBDA Legal Defense each represented one of two lawsuits that led to the decision legalizing same-sex marriage in Washington state. The Northwest Women's Law Center was co-counsel for the couples LAMBDA represented.

The decision came out of two lawsuits filed last spring by gay and lesbian couples who were denied marriage licenses in King County soon after the Massachusetts court ruling that legalized same-sex unions. Eight couples were represented by LAMBDA Legal Defense, a group that promotes gay and lesbian rights; 11 others by the American Civil Liberties Union.

The Seattle decision proves that same-sex couples who challenged the state's definition of marriage "are full and equal citizens of Washington. No more and no less," said Jennifer Pizer, lead counsel in the case for LAMBDA.

Joseph Fuiten, president of Washington Evangelicals for Responsible Government, deplored the ruling as "a breathtaking leap. We don't know where this is going to take us. What are the costs for our society? I'm just stunned that a judge would leap off this building not knowing what is below."

The state is expected to appeal the decision within 30 days and at the same time ask the Supreme Court to review the case on an expedited basis.

The Washington ruling came the day after after voters in Missouri overwhelmingly approved a state constitutional amendment limiting marriage to a union between one man and one woman. Thirteen other states are expected to have fall ballot initiatives offering constitutional amendments to ban same-sex marriage.

California is one of 43 states with laws or court rulings that prohibit same-sex marriage.

Same-sex marriage remains a political flash point, prompting demonstrations at last week's Democratic National Convention in Boston. Protests for and against same-sex marriage also are expected this month at the Republican National Convention in New York.

The Washington ruling "underscores why people are rushing all over the country to strengthen their marriage laws in the face of judicial activism," said Robert Knight, director of the Culture and Family Institute, an affiliate of Concerned Women for America, a Christian conservative advocacy and research organization.

The back-to-back developments on same-sex marriage demonstrate that "we are literally experiencing in America the best of times and the worst of times," said Cheryl Jacques, a former Massachusetts state senator who is president of the Human Rights Campaign, a gay and lesbian advocacy group.

State after state is debating the meaning of marriage -- and whether that right should be extended to gays and lesbians. "We are watching this play out all over the country," Jacques said.

Same-sex marriage gained national prominence in November, when the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts ruled that all citizens in the state had the right to wed, regardless of gender. When the decision took effect May 17, gay and lesbian couples flocked to Massachusetts to exchange vows.

But Gov. Mitt Romney, a Republican who opposes same-sex marriage, swiftly invoked a little-known statute barring out-of-state couples from marrying in Massachusetts if their home states did not acknowledge the unions.

LAMBDA's other lead attorney in the Washington case, Jamie D. Pedersen, said Washington would have no such obstacle.

"We do not have an analog to the Massachusetts law that prevents out-of-state couples from getting married here," Pedersen said. "There is no residency requirement and no requirement that your marriage be legal in the jurisdiction where you came from. So this will be a breakthrough in a way that the Massachusetts law has not been."

Despite the confusion over residency, the transition to same-sex marriage in Massachusetts has been "effortless," said Mary Bonauto, a lawyer for Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders who argued the landmark case in Boston.

"Prior to May 17, many people just could not conceive of a world in which same-sex couples would be making this commitment, and it is now de rigueur," she said, noting that thousands of gay and lesbian couples have married in Massachusetts.

When the Washington lawsuits were filed in March and April, Judge Downing promised a swift response.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|