Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsCalifornia

State Bill Mandates Maternity Coverage

The measure would stop healthcare firms from offering less-expensive individual plans that lack pregnancy benefits.

August 18, 2004|Marc Lifsher, Times Staff Writer

SACRAMENTO — Deborah Elissagaray thought she was making a smart move this year when she bought health insurance that offered neither prenatal nor maternity benefits.

The exclusion cut the price tag of the coverage just about in half -- an important consideration for the owner of a struggling Sierra foothills winery.


Advertisement

"We were going to have a baby eventually," she said, "but not right away."

Elissagaray is now in the fourth month of an unplanned-though-welcome pregnancy. And she has become a vocal advocate of a bill in the state Legislature that would make it illegal to sell individual health insurance without maternity benefits.

The measure by Sen. Jackie Speier (D-Hillsborough) would affect a relatively small number of Californians: the 354,000 who get their health insurance outside of employer-provided group plans and don't buy maternity coverage.

But the bill, which has passed the Senate and is expected to come up for a vote in the Assembly this week, is the center of a battle that pits women's groups and consumer, labor and medical organizations against business and insurance lobbyists.

It's also splitting the healthcare industry. Kaiser Permanente, the state's largest healthcare provider, thinks maternity care should be part of any basic health service. Slightly smaller rival Blue Cross of California, a subsidiary of WellPoint Health Networks Inc., contends that getting pregnant is a choice and that outlawing the exclusion would drive up insurance costs.

Speier and her supporters say they want to protect women against discrimination and prevent insurance companies from exploiting a legal loophole by covering only certain medical conditions -- a practice known as cherry-picking. (Federal law prohibits insurers from excluding maternity benefits from employer health plans, which cover 97% of Californians who have health insurance.)

"If you're going to tailor healthcare to the individual ... everybody's costs would skyrocket," Speier said. "The reason that healthcare works now is because we spread the risks over the entire population."

Maternity and prenatal benefits for individual policies are the only ones that can be opted out of, she said. Exclusions aren't available for other gender-specific conditions such as prostate or ovarian cancer, she noted.

Cut-rate policies that exclude maternity coverage are an example of now-outlawed "gender discrimination" in health insurance, which once denied coverage for female contraceptives and mammograms, Speier said.

Los Angeles Times Articles
|