YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Insurance for Tax Shelters Targeted

Legislators want to crack down on policies that pay firms when strategies are ruled illegal. Industry says action is unwarranted.

June 07, 2004|Evan Halper | Times Staff Writer

SACRAMENTO — California lawmakers, concerned about rampant use of questionable tax shelters, are infuriated that some insurance companies are offering to back these arrangements and pay any fines or penalties for taxpayers caught using plans that turn out to be illegal.

Some lawmakers want to ban the insurance policies, which they say serve little purpose other than to help millionaires cheat the tax system.

"I think this is outrageous," said Assemblyman Dario Frommer (D-Los Angeles), who on Friday introduced a bill, AB 1297, to outlaw the policies. "The message I am hearing is, 'Don't worry about it. If you use a tax shelter that is illegal and you are caught, you won't pay a dime.' "

"These insurance companies are probably betting that some of these people will never get caught," Frommer said.

Industry officials, however, say the legislative effort is misguided. An executive from one company accused of selling such coverage said that while his firm does insure corporate tax returns, his firm would not put its money behind illegal strategies.

At issue are complicated transactions that corporations and affluent individuals use to cut their tax bills. They often involve taking advantage of provisions in the state and federal tax laws to make it appear that they have less income than they really do.

Experts say shelters can involve a wide variety of legal and illegal techniques that are often difficult to detect. Tax officials say they typically involve many kinds of investments intended to reduce tax liability. But under investigation are such techniques as moving money offshore and creating the false appearance of large donations to charity that can be reported as a tax deduction.

California, short of tax revenue, has been aggressively cracking down and looking for ways to recoup the estimated $1 billion a year lost as a result of the shelters. The state stepped up its effort in April with an investigation by the California Franchise Tax Board into companies it believes have insured taxpayers using abusive shelters.

The board has issued subpoenas to two insurance companies suspected of providing the policies, AIG and Hartford Financial Services Group, in the hope of locating tax evaders.

The latest bill stands a relatively good chance of approval, as many lawmakers who initially seemed unenthusiastic about the state's getting tough on the shelters are now bragging about the success of the effort.

But there are plenty of critics of the state's enforcement efforts.

Chris Micheli, a lobbyist for business groups, said the proposal is too heavy-handed and will make it harder for businesses to get insurance to cover legitimate needs.

"The Legislature ought to be cautioned about its overzealousness," he said.

Insurance companies and some tax lawyers say the lawmakers have it all wrong -- that the companies would never provide back-up for risky schemes that carry huge penalties.

But critics of tax insurance -- which can cost hundreds of thousands of thousands dollars upfront -- charge there are documented cases where accounting firms offer it to rich taxpayers to lure them into buying shelters that flout tax laws.

Their evidence includes documents from KPMG, one of the country's major accounting firms. In a list of selling points obtained by a U.S. Senate committee, the firm encouraged its sales staff to use the insurance policies to nudge reluctant clients into signing up for a questionable shelter. The IRS is now investigating the shelter's legality.

The tax plan that KPMG was trying to sell used a series of complicated transactions to give taxpayers the appearance of having donated millions to a charity. The taxpayer would take the tax deduction, and get the money back later.

The list of selling points instructed staff as their "absolutely last resort" to tell wary potential buyers that "at least 3 insurance companies have stated they will insure the tax benefits of the transaction."

KPMG staffers identified AIG and Hartford as two of those companies, according to the Senate report.

Spokespeople for AIG and KPMG declined to comment and officials with Hartford did not return phone calls.

But in an article published last month in the industry magazine Trusts & Estates, David Deberry, a vice president with Hartford, said the company will only insure tax returns it is confident are legal.

Others say a lot of tax law is a legally gray area, and making these insurance policies illegal would discourage businesses from even engaging in conservative planning strategies.

Carlyn McCaffrey, an attorney in New York who represents a broker of tax insurance policies, says there are many instances in which it takes months for the courts to determine whether a tax shelter is legal or not. And sometimes the courts rule they are illegal after teams of attorneys had advised clients that they were legal.

Los Angeles Times Articles