Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsCrosses

High-Profile Cross for Sale in Simi

The park district hopes to avoid a lawsuit over the landmark, which sits on publicly owned land.

May 29, 2004|Gregory W. Griggs, Times Staff Writer

Seeking to avoid a lawsuit, Simi Valley park officials plan to sell a 12-foot cross that has stood atop Mt. McCoy on the city's west end for more than 60 years.

For some, the cross is a cherished piece of the valley's history; for others it is a religious symbol unsuited for public property.


Advertisement

The white concrete structure, which was designated a historic landmark in 1986, is near the location where Spanish priests erected a cross in the early 19th century as a guidepost for people traveling between the Ventura and San Fernando missions.

The Simi Valley Historical Society, which operates a museum down the hill from the cross, offered to buy the cross a year ago from the Rancho Simi Recreation and Park District to ensure it remained a fixture in the community. The park board has scheduled a public hearing on the proposed sale at its meeting Wednesday.

"You talk to people who have grown up here in the valley who said they'd look for that cross when driving, knowing they were close to home," said Caryl Barefoot, the society's president. "It's been a part of a lot of people's heritage growing up."

It's also part of the city's history. In maps dating back to 1855, a cross is shown standing in the same general vicinity. The current cross, which was provided by a local service club in 1941, replaced a wooden structure at the site west of Madera Road and south of Tierra Rejada Road.

Stuart Bechman, president of the Ventura County chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, first raised questions three years ago about whether the cross owned by the park district violates federal and state constitutional guarantees of the separation of church and state.

Though he never pursued legal action against the park district, he suggested it could be vulnerable.

"They've been very gracious in listening to my concerns," Bechman said. "I have no complaints about how they've handled it at all."

Unlike some, Bechman said he was not bothered by the cross' prominent hilltop presence. For him, the issue centers strictly on whether it is appropriate for a religious symbol to be placed on public property.

"I really have no problem with religious symbols on private land," he said.

Under terms of the proposed deal, the park district would sell the cross and two-thirds of an acre to the historical society for $1,980. The district is exempt from opening the sale up to bids because the amount is lower than the appraised value of the land, which the district received as part of a donation from a developer.

Los Angeles Times Articles
|