Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsOpinion

Keep Your Hands Off My DNA

If Proposition 69 passes, too many of us will end up in a criminal database.

Commentary

October 14, 2004|William C. Thompson, William C. Thompson, a professor in the department of criminology, law and society at UC Irvine, helped expose problems in several forensic laboratories, including DNA testing errors in the Houston Police Department crime laboratory that sent an innocent man to prison.

As fans of the "CSI" television shows know, DNA testing is an amazing tool for solving crimes. Tiny biological samples left behind by a criminal, such as blood, hair, semen or saliva, can be "profiled" and compared with DNA from possible suspects for a possible match. When police don't have a suspect, they can search state and national databases for a match -- a so-called cold hit. California has a database that contains DNA profiles of convicted sex offenders and violent felons. Many criminals don't have to worry about cold hits, however, because, if they are not convicted sex offenders or violent felons, their DNA profiles are not in the database.


Advertisement

Should we expand the state's DNA database to include more potential criminals? Proposition 69 on the Nov. 2 ballot offers voters the opportunity to do just that. It would require collection of DNA from any person convicted of any felony. It also would require collection of DNA samples from people arrested but not yet convicted of felonies. Initially, this provision would cover only those arrested for violent or sex-related crimes, but after a five-year interval (presumably to allow the state to improve its testing capacity) the requirement would extend to anyone arrested for a felony. And it doesn't stop there.

Under current law, police can collect samples from people they merely suspect of a crime, either by asking them to provide a sample voluntarily or by taking their DNA surreptitiously. (A favorite ploy is to collect a soda straw or cup from which the person has been drinking.) These samples can be compared only with samples from that investigation, and cannot be added to the state's DNA database unless the suspect is indicted or formally charged with a violent felony or sex crime. Even then, the profiles do not stay permanently in the database unless the person is convicted.

Proposition 69 would eliminate these restrictions and allow samples collected from anyone who is a suspect for any crime to be typed and the DNA profiles to be entered into the state's database. Under Proposition 69, a cop who suspects you of the crime of spitting on the sidewalk could collect your spittle, have it analyzed and have your DNA profile entered into the state's database. Once your profile is in the database, it becomes part of a national database administered by the FBI that can be searched for matches to crime samples from throughout the U.S. and, in some instances, from foreign countries.

Los Angeles Times Articles
|