Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

THE CONFLICT IN IRAQ

Iraqis Want the U.S. to Leave -- but Not Just Yet

They say the Americans should first 'fix what they broke here' by restoring security.

September 19, 2004|Patrick J. McDonnell | Times Staff Writer

BAGHDAD — Retired police officer Abaas Ramah is scornful of the U.S. presence in Iraq.

"Where is the freedom they promised?" he asks. "All the bloodshed, the sabotage, the killings. Who is paying the price? We, the Iraqi civilians."

But asked whether U.S. forces should pull out immediately, he responds: Absolutely not.

"There will be genocide here if they leave right now," Ramah answers. "They destroyed this country, and it is their responsibility to make it stand again.... Iraq is like a sick old woman who needs America to treat her right now."

Iraq is struggling with a guerrilla war, a stagnant economy and widespread despair. Many of its people are ambivalent about the continuing U.S. presence. Among the great majority of Iraqis who applauded the downfall of Saddam Hussein, there is deep resentment of what they view as Washington's myriad missteps. Chief among them is disbanding the military and police forces, a step they blame for today's rampant lack of security. Iraqis consistently identify lawlessness and violence as their country's gravest problems.

Polls show increasing anti-U.S. sentiment and a growing sense that American forces should get out and leave things to the Iraqis.

Despite such complaints, many Iraqis hesitate to endorse an immediate U.S. pullout, before some semblance of an effective Iraqi national security apparatus is in place. Some of those angriest about perceived U.S. missteps are the ones most adamant that U.S. forces stick around and try and patch things up, or at least assist in elections scheduled for early next year.

"We hope for the occupation forces to leave Iraq ... but they must first fix what they broke here," said Sabah Wissam, 29, a Baghdad barber. "If they leave now, the strong will eat the weak.... I don't know how the Americans wanted to bring democracy to us overnight. It's just another one of their mistakes."

The contradictory desire for U.S. forces to leave as soon as possible -- but also to remain at the ready as a guarantor of some stability -- has caused considerable soul-searching among Iraqis.

"Emotionally, so many of us feel we want the Americans out of Iraq," said Hassan Bazzaz, a U.S.-educated political scientist who runs an independent institute analyzing opinion and culture. "But when it comes down to it, we feel that we could get into more trouble without having the Americans here.... There's a lot of mixed feelings out there. I don't quite know how we keep both ideas working together."

Rasha Amin Saleh, a college student in the northern city of Mosul, articulated this ambivalence.

"The Americans liberated us when we were unable to liberate ourselves," Saleh said. "But now they are occupiers, it is true. Yet their departure could lead to civil war. It could make things worse."

Some Iraqis, however, have no mixed feelings.

Those directly involved in the armed insurgency clearly want an immediate U.S. withdrawal. At the other end of the spectrum are many Kurds and other pro-Western Iraqis. They say they wouldn't mind if a U.S. military contingent remained indefinitely as a safeguard against a return to tyranny or incursions by neighboring states.

"I've never considered the American troops as occupiers," said Isaa Ahmed Abbasi, 31, a physician in the northern city of Irbil in the north. "The people who want them out are seeking to benefit, like Saddam. They will start to kill people for the sake of the president's chair."

But the Kurds' enthusiasm for the U.S. presence does not reflect sentiment elsewhere in the country, where disillusionment appears to be on the rise.

Iraqis also struggle with a wounded sense of pride. Many bitterly resent having foreign troops on their soil. This is true even for the Shiite Muslims who suffered under Hussein and largely welcomed his downfall.

"A patriotic viewpoint is that the Americans should leave today -- before tomorrow," said Haider Abdul-Jabbar, a police lieutenant in the Shiite holy city of Najaf. "But realistically, we must surrender to the status quo.... Otherwise we will lose more blood and there will only be more foreign presence in Iraq."

Shiite Muslims seem somewhat more upbeat about the U.S. role than Sunni Muslims, many of whom express a sense of broad disenfranchisement since the ouster of Hussein, a fellow Sunni.

"We don't want the Americans to stay in Iraq even for another moment," said Luay Raheem Badrani, a lawyer in the largely Sunni city of Fallouja, a stronghold of the insurgency and a frequent target of U.S. bombs. "We feel they are choking us. The predicament of occupied people is always difficult. Especially for we Iraqis -- we have a 9,000-year history!"

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|