Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsOpinion

John Edwards' Problem Brother

A seeming liability could politically aid the candidate.

Commentary

September 29, 2004|Dalton Conley, Dalton Conley is the director of the Center for Advanced Social Science Research and author of "The Pecking Order: Which Siblings Succeed and Why" (Pantheon, 2004).

Wesley Blake Edwards -- better known as the kid brother of vice presidential nominee John Edwards -- is scheduled to go on trial today in Colorado, answering 10-year-old charges of driving while intoxicated.

Wesley Edwards has been arrested on numerous occasions for driving drunk. He has skipped out of court appearances. So, while he finally faces the music, political junkies must be wondering: Is he Roger Clinton lite? Or perhaps the second coming of Billy Carter?


For The Record
Los Angeles Times Friday October 01, 2004 Home Edition California Part B Page 11 Editorial Pages Desk 1 inches; 33 words Type of Material: Correction
Edwards' brother -- A Wednesday commentary said that a Colorado drunk driving trial for John Edwards' brother, Wesley Blake Edwards, was scheduled to begin Wednesday. Actually, it had been postponed until Nov. 29.


Advertisement

Democrats would probably like to sweep Wesley Edwards under the rug. They shouldn't, for two reasons: John Edwards' tribulations with his younger sibling only enhance his image as the only candidate with true "Joe Sixpack" roots. And, as John Edwards grapples with his brother's problems, we may actually learn something compelling about this man who wants to lead us.

Most American families, rich or poor, have some black sheep -- a brother or sister or cousin -- who causes immense pain to the rest of the family as relatives fret over whether to bail him or her out yet again. What humanizes John Edwards, though, is that his brother's situation particularly identifies him not with the elite but with the rest of us.

When a sheep goes astray in a working-class family, there are usually not enough money, time and connections to do much about it, especially when the family's efforts have already been expended on the star, say a John Edwards or a Bill Clinton.

Working-class families that produce presidents are no longer exceptional, and so we are becoming more familiar with the antics of the siblings left behind. There was Donald Nixon's "loan" from Howard Hughes to support his marketing of Nixonburgers. There was the infamous Billybeer venture, not to mention Billy Carter's registration as an "agent" of the Libyan government. And Roger Clinton's drug arrest hardly added luster to that family's image.

Contrast those tales with similar stories among presidential families that are rich and prominent. In poor families, the star often gets the biggest slice at the proverbial family table, but in well-to-do households, it is usually the laggard who gets the most parental investment. Jeb Bush was an honors student, graduating college at 20 to become a rising star in Florida politics. Less successful Bush brothers Neil and George W. kept needing -- and getting -- second chances as they flailed about in the business world. Remember Neil and the Silverado savings-and-loan scandal? Or a young, fun-loving George W.'s failed attempt at drilling oil?

Los Angeles Times Articles
|